• Alimentar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    The threat wasn’t to attack. It was more of a warning, saying that if NATO was to step onto Russian soil he would use them.

    Nuclear weapons are basically a defensive weapon. You never aim to use them but you have them as a deterrent. No country wants to mess with it or test whether a nuclear nation would use it

    To do so is suicide, both to call their bluff or to use the weapons. So you get into a state where militarily no one can do anything (except wage a war in a country that doesn’t have nuclear weapons).

    That’s kinda the purpose of nuclear weaponry. To use then it’s basically game over for everyone everywhere.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      saying that if NATO was to step onto Russian soil he would use them.

      Did he use those exact words? Last I recall he said if the existence of Russia was in jeopardy.

    • isles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      you get into a state where militarily no one can do anything (except wage a war in a country that doesn’t have nuclear weapons)

      ok, I got it. Give every country nuclear weapons and then there is nowhere to wage war.

      • Alimentar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Well military yes. You still have economic and cyber wars and colour revolutions (upsetting the locals to raise up against the power). Which honestly you’re seeing more of.

        Don’t worry, the powers will always find ways to innovate.