I use Fedora 38, it’s stable, things just work, and the software is up-to-date.

  • Björn Tantau@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    OpenSUSE Tumbleweed. I like it for being a rolling release with quality control. On the one hand I don’t like its restrictive defaults but on the other hand I know enough to work with them and that’s given me a leaner system.

    • croobat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ever tried paru? Did the jump a while ago and it is slightly better, the best kind of better.

      • U de Recife@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been messing with paru to gauge its functionality against yay.

        So far I’m unimpressed. The cli display is somewhat tidier/neat. I like that. But when it comes to actually installing something, it’s less than stellar.

        For instance, if I want to skip any confirmation, I can use the undocumented flag --noconfirm. But that only works if I’m passing the flag to install, -S. If, say, I’m searching for a package, simply typing paru <package>, then the interactive menu no longer works. It simply exits with the message ‘nothing to do’.

        yay, on the other hand, works flawlessly with the --noconfirm flag.

        I noticed that paru has some upgrading/updating features that are nice. I might use it once in a while to upgrade/update the system. But that’s pretty much it for now.

      • U de Recife@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for reminding me of paru! I’ve checked and I have it installed already. But I confess that I’m so used to yay that I completely forgot about paru.

        Do you have any paru tutorial you recommend?

  • dotslashme@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Arch Linux because it has sane defaults, is rolling, up to date, helpful community, awesome wiki and is minimalistic.

  • gobbling871@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Relatively fast updates, AUR, PKGBUILD, Downgrade, the Wiki, the community, not controlled by some corporate entity, no telemetry, and last but not least the logo ;)

    • 347_is_p69@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      How different (if at all) does Nixos feel as a daily driver, if at all? Is it only about getting used to the system, or does it require to do everything the Nixos way?

      Also how does user-level configuration work? Does the upgrade system just ignore your $HOME in terms of version control?