cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 9 months agoThe code was very janky, but it workedi.imgflip.comimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1481arrow-down19
arrow-up1472arrow-down1imageThe code was very janky, but it workedi.imgflip.comcantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 9 months agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-squarecarpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·9 months agoNot a JS dev either but ===. Not really sure what the (+x) is about
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agothe remainder operator should return a number or a NaN right? do we actually need the triple here?
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-29 months agoNot really. But with JS it’s better safe than sorry. The GP’s addition is unnecessary, but I fully support anyone that decides to do it.
Not a JS dev either but
===.Not really sure what the
(+x)is aboutthe remainder operator should return a number or a NaN right? do we actually need the triple here?
Not really. But with JS it’s better safe than sorry.
The GP’s addition is unnecessary, but I fully support anyone that decides to do it.
point taken!