• ugo@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’ll probably want to try to make your disinformation more believable in the future

      • sab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Readable would be a start. I’m still not entirely sure what it is I’m being misinformed about.

        • thesmokingman@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’ve moved the goalposts. CPU is one thing that is objectively wrong. My older gen i7 doesn’t work with Win11 and has no problem with all the distros I’ve thrown at it.

          Nvidia GPU is totally different from CPU. I think most reasonable Linux folks will agree that Nvidia drivers can be problematic and that is a weak point.

    • db2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would you like some dressing with your word salad? Nothing you said actually makes sense or reflects reality.

    • Mambert@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve always been able to read that my kernel is included in an update.

      Are you updating throught he command line or some visual front?

      And 1200 packages? I run arch (btw) and only get ~250 a week.

    • Auster@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Looking for a more stable distro could be a good idea. Some distros are pretty much only PoC, or too niche to have a good support, or the beta channel of another, better supported distro.

    • Trebach@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve yet to run into a CPU that doesn’t work with 11
      Every AMD processor from the Ryzen 1000-series and older. I’m not sure where the line is with Intel processors, but requiring TPM excludes a lot of otherwise useful hardware.

    • ferralcat@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve always found the Tpm complaints a little suspicious. The same people who go on and on about how much they worry about security and privacy and how MS doesn’t care, suddenly just don’t give a shit in these cases. I assume they mostly just want to shit on stuff.

      It’s a good to push to make it standard and hardware manufacturers wont without a good old shove.

      • Zatujit@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I complain about TPM because it made my system unable to boot without desactivating it, i don’t really care about TPM but the implementation seems disastrous