• poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You are missing the point. More contributions to Linux helps RHEL more than copy-cat re-builds that contribute nothing.

    • gobbling871@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      More contributions to Linux from parties other than RHEL don’t help RHEL. That’s literally the view they have taken since their announcement.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That is not what they said at all. They said pure bug-for-bug compatible rebuilds don’t help RHEL. Which is undeniably true.

        • gobbling871@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Just because they said that they don’t think RHEL clones contribute to the RHEL ecosystem doesn’t mean that it is entirely true. Are you new to PR speak?

          • poVoq@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yet they consistently say that other contributions to Linux are very welcome and help RHEL, CentOS stream and everyone else. I think you have a strong case of selective memory and reading comprehension that only sees what fits into your pre-determined world-view 😜

            • gobbling871@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes. What they say and their actions are entirely contradictory in my own warped view.

              But good thing am not the only one who seems to think so 🤪 as clearly Oracle and SUSE agree with this view.

              • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                If one thing has always been true, it is that Oracle will always chose the wrong side of history no matter what.

                Be careful who your allies are 😬

                • gobbling871@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t really care that much for Oracle’s role in Linux but IBM’s Red Hat is clearly the drunk guy here.

        • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think maybe to point out that SUSE is already the second largest enterprise Linux provider in the market. They already studied RHEL code, this would have been a gentleman’s agreement broken not to outright copy each other. RHEL will easily copy SLES improvements and incorporate it into their own code, but SUSE will gain marketshare.