I am not allowed to credit the site that has this disaster. Its owner said “Nobody should see that”

  • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    At least that’s actually easy and quick to do and is the only way of doing it. Centering a div however has 81639393 ways and it seems the one that works is different every time

    • Codex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      5 months ago

      Bro its so easy bro, just use flexboxgridcolumns its been a standard since 2010 just flex it bro you haven’t learned to flex yet just check w3c schools and add a flex you can polyfill it but don’t use that hacked one use the good flexpolyfill then { content-align-middle-child-elements: center-middle-true-neutral } so easy with flex bro

      • CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        5 months ago

        I know you meant this sarcastically, but yes, flex is a good option for centering something. Either that or setting the left and right margins of the element to auto, which is generally even easier.

        Basically, if you’re in a flex container use flex, if you’re in a grid use grid, and if neither of those apply set the left and right margins to auto.

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Also seriously, anybody having problems with flexbox should try this:

          https://flexboxfroggy.com/

          I’m not sure there’s any version of it for grids, but IMO grids are inherently more intuitive, so it may not be needed. Flexbox is the one that is hard to learn.

          • davidgro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            I don’t know any CSS (despite reading memes about it like this) but I do know that the bottom of that page has a link to something called Grid Garden

          • CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Well, flexbox and grid have different purposes in my opinion/experience. Personally I use grid for “top level” layouts like the layout of the whole site, while I tend to prefer flexbox for layouts inside the grid. Of course that’s just a rule of thumb, there are absolutely cases where this isn’t the best option.

      • drathvedro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s 2024 and flexboxes still don’t work that well with vertical direction and wraparound…

          • drathvedro@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Sure. Here you go. The green container should cover all red boxes in both cases. I’ve been bashing my head against this issue for a while, but, as far as I understand, this is a bug that’s never going to be fixed. Which sucks, because I wanted to re-design some of the apps in the horizontal metro-style scrolling manner for the bottom screen on my zephyrus duo, but this effectively prevents me from doing so (Unless I use grids and set positions manually).

            • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              That’s interesting. Chrome displays it as you intended, Firefox doesn’t. I guess it’s required that the vertical flex be inline-flex?

              • drathvedro@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Huh, neat. The last time I looked, chrome was also plagued by this. Might actually re-start some projects I had, but it sucks to have to use chrome.

                inline-flex is indeed necessary since we’re growing left to right and flex would take the entire/fixed width, unless it’s also inside a flexbox.

                • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  it sucks to have to use chrome

                  I also hate to admit it, but Chrome currently is the superior browser.

                  • drathvedro@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Chromium is a superior engine, yes. But Chrome itself, at least in my eyes, looks to be the least capable browser out of the bunch. I’d rather Vivaldi if I had to switch.

                  • drathvedro@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    EDIT: Alright, this is a terrible case because the parent element has flex and therefore no inline-flex is necessary there, but I’d argue it’s the parent element being flex that is redundant, rather than child element being inline.