• PainInTheAES@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    CrowdStrike does more than anti-virus and yes enterprise Linux installations need a lot of security controls that average Linux users don’t need.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ok fine simps, Linux is exactly as shitty as windows this was totally only a coincidence

      • PainInTheAES@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Bruh, I’ve used Linux for over 10 years. I run Arch on my laptop and have a homelab powered by Proxmox, Debian, and OPNSense. I don’t run any AV in my lab but do follow other security practices.

        At work it’s a different story. Products like CrowdStrike also collect logs, scan for vulnerabilities, provide graphing and dashboarding capabilities, provide integrations into ticketing platforms for investigation and remediation by security teams, and more. AV is often required because Windows users can upload infected files to Linux-run SMB shares. Products like CrowdStrike often satisfy requirements set by cybersecurity insurance.

        This is not simping, this is not Linux vs Windows. You just clearly have no experience in the enterprise Linux space and business security requirements.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I don’t need to argue about windows vs Linux. You’re overcomplicating and misinterpreting my point and it’s no longer worth it to me because you clearly are prioritizing defense

          Edit: let’s see if we can get to 100 downvotes here. I mean this shit is just so offensive right?