mafbar@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoBell curve of text editorslemmy.worldimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1100arrow-down128file-text
arrow-up172arrow-down1imageBell curve of text editorslemmy.worldmafbar@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square42fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareNetto Hikari@social.fossware.spacelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoI like both. But many people don’t even realize that nano has quite a lot of configuration options. To me, they’re text editors, not code editors. For code, I use VSCode (or “code”, the FOSS variant).
minus-squarePlexSheep@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoI have never heard of customisation for nano. That said, I’m quite pleased with programming my vim how I like it.
minus-squaredream_weasel@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoTreesitter and native LSP levels the playing field pretty handily IMO.
minus-squareDohnakun@lemmy.fmhy.mlBlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoYes, but for a quick edit or glance, nano-syntax-highlight and lesspipe with highlight or bat are nice.
I like both. But many people don’t even realize that nano has quite a lot of configuration options. To me, they’re text editors, not code editors. For code, I use VSCode (or “code”, the FOSS variant).
I have never heard of customisation for nano. That said, I’m quite pleased with programming my vim how I like it.
/etc/nanorcTreesitter and native LSP levels the playing field pretty handily IMO.
Yes, but for a quick edit or glance, nano-syntax-highlight and lesspipe with highlight or bat are nice.