Why am I writing this post? Not because I hope for something or believe in change. These are just words. I could write this at the end, but then you would be looking for answers for me while reading, and I don’t need them. They won’t change anything. So here it is. I don’t claim to be a software development guru or a C language expert. I’m just a simple developer.

  • Why are we looking for new technologies? Why do we want to be part of a community that is buzzing with new projects? Why do we think that this new programming language will definitely help us create something amazing and truly great and, of course, will make us rich and provide us with a comfortable old age?

  • Why are we offered so many courses in so many programming languages and frameworks? Why do we teach what is required for companies that make money from us?

  • Why are there a lot of conferences on banal simple things, such as *** framework or ### technology (so as not to offend anyone), and there, with a smart look, newly minted gurus tell us how important it is to be able to transfer the value to the client and how to use certain templates?

  • Why do computers become more and more powerful, but programs continue to lag?

  • Why, when applying for a job, do we look for a vacancy based on knowledge of a programming language, but find it only based on knowledge of certain frameworks? Is it really difficult for a professional programmer to learn a framework in a week?

  • Why do we go into software development with the enthusiasm to create something great, but end up in a situation where we are developing some other catalog or some other digital yo-yo to make money?

Reason: because we want our passion for programming, our interest, to also bring us income.
Result: we do not earn this money for ourselves, but for companies whose main goal is to quickly receive income from the software they sell.

I look at how programming has changed over the course of 25 years, what they teach at universities, and where they start. And I came to the conclusion that on a large scale, it was all for the benefit of giant companies or the government.

We must protect the “intimate” knowledge of the foundations and water the roots ourselves. Because they don’t realize, they don’t see that if the roots are not watered, the branches on which they sit will dry out. Therefore, who, if not us?!

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    5·
    21 hours ago

    It’s time to return to the roots, to the C programming language CPU specific Assembly language

    Fix’d

    Joke aside, the answer to most of your questions is “because people with money said so”. As to why programs lag despite computers being more powerful, because shitty programmers and a general “BLA is cheap” mentality, where BLA is processing cycles, RAM, storage, network speed, etc. Funnily enough, the “program using everything the hardware offers” is an old complaint, as even Unix was considered a cancer during the 1980s, mostly by people whose computers did nothing but run very specific LISP code.

    C is not without its flaws, just like every other language. Teaching it over whatever the market desires may not necessarily make better programmers, nor better programs for that matter.

    I look at how programming has changed (…) it was all for the benefit of giant companies or the government.

    Giant companies first, govt second and as a side effect, as govts tend to be veeery slow in adopting certain computer related stuff. I suspect the main exception would be intelligence/espionage agencies, but they also much prefer others doing shit programming, makes their job easier.