I am German and believe me the Nazis were worse.
I’m conflicted about this response because my understanding is that in Germany anything to do with Nazis is highly taboo (understandably), but I wonder if that results in an immediate bias. Not complaining, Nazism is evil, but in your shoes I think I’d be inclined to weight nazis inherently worse as well.
Im Australian aboriginal and it was the Nazis.
The world didnt come together to stop the British.
The Nazis.
And by a lot.
deleted by creator
the British because they had the time. the Nazis did want to basically exterminate most of the world, so it’s a toss-up.
Yeah, it depends on the criteria. The Nazis were only around for a few years, whereas the British did their thing for centuries. The Nazis were a rookie prodigy who retired after a single red-hot season, the British were a multi-season MVP with way more points on the board.
I think the other part is as Colonials, the British ultimately have given their colonies back, and most.of the colonies are in a reletively decent condition, especially when you conpare it to french colonies for example, like Haiti, which went into perpetual debt, and many west African nations which are relevant today due to the uprising.
But then we get into questions of intent and deaths/time. British definitely had more time and I’m pretty sure they had more deaths, though I don’t know the exact numbers. It seems British intent fluctuated based on timeframe and region
This seems like the right approach. You can get different answers depending on which measure you use
You could compare
1.Willful killings in total
-
willful killings per year
-
willful killings during the 1920s-40s
-
willful killings during Churchill’s regime versus Hitler’s regime.
I guess the UK will have higher numbers by every measure except 1. The figures should be easy to find.
-
