What disgruntled them this time that didn’t disgruntle them in the previous 2 years? It went to shit as soon as Elon bought it. Were they just ignoring the red flags for 2 years straight?
What disgruntled them this time that didn’t disgruntle them in the previous 2 years? It went to shit as soon as Elon bought it. Were they just ignoring the red flags for 2 years straight?
You can do it on GrapheneOS if you have a Pixel phone
Yea this is not feasible or sustainable lol May as well track every bird on planet earth.
damn it… 😂
What does a healthy opinion of F-Droid look like though? Lol
They’ve been doing this tactic for a few years now. Not a new thing tbh.
Whats the issue with iCloud?
Oh my sweet summer child
and after that, sue the the grocery store industry for feeding those criminal scum.
Does mint really have you install a steam .deb file?
Did it get leaked or something?
Yeah the way I remember it, they put a lot of effort into masking that social graph. That was a while back too, not recent.
Whats the vulnerability with Signal and phone numbers?
Yes, verified boot will have out-of-bands alerts for you by design. Without the online component, you will risk not being able to detect tampering.
If the hardware is tampered, it will not pass the attestation test, which is an online component. It will fail immediately and you will be alerted. Thats the part of verified boot that makes this so much harder for adversaries. They would have to compromise both systems. The attestation system is going to be heavily guarded.
Compromised hardware doesn’t know the signatures. Math.
If the hardware signatures don’t match, it wont boot without giving a warning. If the TPM/Secure Enclave is replaced/removed/modified, it will not boot without giving a warning.
Thats correct. Thats one of the many perks.
Its more about protecting your boot process from malware.
Community Forums