ActuallyRuben

It has some good parts, such as the ability to use for loops, and the fact you can kind of avoid using it as much thanks to it’s webassembly support

Maybe I’m too European to understand your point, but my phone selling my call and message history would be just as outrageous.

Is the user aware that the data they synchronize to their car, a machine that they own, is sold by the car manufacturer to advertisers? Do they explicitly agree to the selling of their data, when selecting what connectivity they want?

Can you blame the user for making a choice, when they’re not told the consequences of that choice?

Interesting, I did not expect them to meet SIL4 standards, that’s not an easy achievement.

Sounds a lot like flattening with extra steps to me

I recently had GCC give me the error “returning to the gate for a mechanical issue”, fun stuff as well

So, nobody?

That’s not entirely true. OverlayFS supports page cache sharing for files in image layers. If your images share the same base image layer, then it should share libc and friends in the page cache.

https://docs.docker.com/storage/storagedriver/overlayfs-driver/#overlayfs-and-docker-performance

Does the People(Vec) even work if you don’t specify the type inside the Vec?

Sweet! Now I don’t have to recursively write comments to explain the meaning of each comment

Can’t you just use the get_or_init method instead of get inside the push_log method? This would initialize the cell on first use. You’d still need a Mutex inside of it to acquire a mutable reference to the vector.

Yes, but windows is an entire operating system, with an antivirus included

Still, who pays 419$ for an antivirus?

I don’t think oli-obk has any say in this as they stated the following:

Because this crate is owned by dtolnay and he may do with it as he wishes. My personal opinions on the topic are irrelevant.

Source

If it creates infinite number of people, it could solve world hunger with some good ol’ Soylent green thinking. Although you might want to figure out how to slow down the trolley at some point.

On most, if not all, modern Android phones you can just unlock the bootloader from the dev menu. No rooting required.

Did you try requesting your data? I got my data within a day. They probably mention 30 days because that’s the legally defined deadline, and to give themselves some leeway in case the automated system has issues with some user.

It also makes sense for them to make it a low-priority task, as they have a really long deadline for it, and you don’t want it affecting the main site.

They’re definitely automated. I doubt it’ll do much in terms of protesting.

Unless I’m missing something, I think you can clean it up and keep your static dispatch by turning the Driver struct into a trait:

You’d rename your struct Driver to struct DriverImpl, define a trait Driver and for the implementation you’d use impl Driver for DriverImpl where etc...

Simple quantum search entanglement. By observing the result, Torvald has changed the outcome.

But seriously, it’s because his post gets reposted and federated across all those instances, and Google deems those more relevant than the GitHub page.