A few months ago, the search engine expanded its offering by making available data from OCLC’s proprietary WorldCat database. Anna’s Archive scraped several terabytes of data over the course of a year and published roughly 700 million unique records online, for free.

Scraping data is now “hacking”. Every single computer science department will have to close its doors and surrender their research datasets to the police.

I’m also for that.

quad core laptops with IPS screens that can run up to 16 GB are like $50 nowadays. throw it out.

Feel free to send me the $50 bucks and I’ll buy one. I still won’t throw out perfectly functional hardware. Until then I’ll make use of what I have, thank you very much.

Didn’t realise I walked into comedy central.

By “stable” I mean that for the majority of the time I will not have any electricity or internet. My use case explicitly requires battery and offline software.

I’ll be away from both stable electricity and stable internet so I can’t just ditch a battery.

Friendly reminder to build from source and not execute unknown .exes if you’re a windows user. It is very common for a program to be “open source” in theory but add unwanted stuff in their official executables. Those programs look alright, but never hurts to be careful.

I apologize for the inconvenience, but as an AI language model, I don’t have direct access to books or copyrighted materials like “The Bedwetter” by Sarah Silverman.

Pack it up, guys!

On a serious note corporations abusing authors’ copyrighted work is on an entire different level to civilian piracy and I hope they get seriously shafted over it. Same thing for Bing and Bard. All of chatGPT is built on dubious or outright illegal datasets and there is no reason huge multinationals shouldn’t at least pay and inform the authors of those works. But in reality the blame will probably be shifted to the libraries.