11·
4 months agoHow would nominating a dem VP by Dems via voting cause a civil war?
BlitzFitz
- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 14th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
And if it’s just for one party vs both, what would that be bad?
I get why it was changed for VP for the dem vs Republican nominee. But why wouldn’t we want, as a party, better representation on who we voted for.
Maybe it’s the time to go back to how things were when the US was founded. We have a vote and top two are President and VP nominees. Keeps the party aligned to what we actually care about and who we think is best, vs who the nominee or party thinks might be best.
More democratic this way
I believe there is an initiative by some big banks to push for wire transfers to be done via a blockchain as opposed to slow ach transfers.
They call it quantum computing or something like that… but seemed like it had potential to solve some issues with slow banking
127·1 year agoOutside of Jake Gyllenhaal being a Persian, I agree. Fun movie
Lol sort of. That’s more like two people talking at the same time at each other. But more kicking
I have actually dealt with a partial deaf blind student back in elementary school.
You can sign ASL into their hand so they can feel what you’re signing(normally individual letters). Or they hold your hands to feel the gesture/sign you’re are making.
They read braille as a just a blind person would.
But over all takes more effort to learn this way.
Ok, but that’s for the EC and for presidential and VP nominees by the EC.
In the dnc we have delegates with 1 vote for their nominee. If the delegates vote for 1 dem and another gets the 2nd amount of votes, then they’d be Pres and VP nominees for the dnc. Or actually do ranked choice for dnc nominees to get voter ranking of nominees.
How is it better for a presidential nominee to pick who they want vs listening to the peoples actual preferences.