I’m not asking to see the comments for myself, I’m asking if you can point to evidence of this happening; it’s not the same question.
Marx was the third ever sociologist, the first being Weber and the second I always forget his name. But this is historically attested to, it’s not something I just pulled out of my ass lol
European Jews were not considered white before and during WW2. Whiteness has always changed with whatever we needed it to be for political reasons. The Irish were not considered white. In South Africa during Apartheid, a Japanese national was forbidden by a bus driver from entering a whites-only bus because the driver thought he was Chinese. The man sued and won against the driver as the Japanese were considered white and allowed to board segregated buses.
Fun fact: did you know the ICC has only ever prosecuted African nationals since its inception in 2002?
The point is that you are unwilling to even engage with the idea that Russia seeks to eliminate Ukrainian identity
Is that like a litmus test? Next time I’m ordering pizza I’ll ask the restaurant if they are willing to engage with the idea that Russia seeks to eliminate Ukrainian identity.
Literally no idea why you brought that up again lol
Okay so no evidence Hexbear or Lemmygrad have denied genocides?
A correction: Lemmygrad and Hexbear are two different instances, and it’s an oversimplification to lump them in together. Lemmygrad does not defederate from any real instance, we have possibly one of the smallest block lists of any bigger instances.
Capital is a thesis on economy, why would it help you on politics?
Surely you’d know what it’s about if you’ve read it.
It’s funny how fascists always leave out the part that actually gets them called a fascist, isn’t it?
Marxism is relevant to everything through dialectics, which was synthesized by Hegel first. Also the emoji size is a quirk of Lemmy, all custom emojis take up their original size on other instances regardless of which instance it comes from.
Written by Timofei Sergeitsev in RIA Novosti, the rhetoric in the editorial…
Oh so it’s not a “Kremlin paper”, it’s just what some guy thinks. If there are “no more Nazis in Ukraine than anywhere else” then there are no more nazis in Russia than anywhere else 🙃
Can you point to genocide denial before you make sweeping accusations?
I hope Russia invades your house. Not your country or neighbourhood, but just your house specifically.
Genocide of native Americans is solved because they get to build casinos lmao I hope you lose all your money there and go bankrupt, gtfo
Ethnic minorities in Indonesia with US guidance 🙃 Koreans 🙃 Vietnam 🙃
Bro really thought no genocides happened in the 50s huh
All human creative output is biased, ProleWiki just doesn’t pretend it’s not biased by hiding behind scholars and quotes that agree with the editor.
It does give a definition: that there is none (lack of a definition is a definition). This is pretty clear if you read the whole page. Authoritarianism is just trying to distance itself from authority because all states wield authority in various ways, and so a word was created to separate the two and criticize the socialist bloc that also wielded authority, like the west did, but their authority was bad you see, not like ours which is good.
But why am I saying this; you didn’t read the page, you’re not gonna read this either.
In fact nobody has ever really been able to articulate to me why authoritarianism is bad beyond “I want my freedom”. It just inherently is undesirable, don’t ask too many questions, just accept it.
More than 1/6th of the world still is, and it’s working spectacularly for them
Nice strawman have you ever talked to one of us