And are essentially immortal entities

So if x has superior ownership, then they should be subject to every illegal thing ever posted on X.

Including CSAM posts and other illegal things.

So whos the pedo now Elon?

The only thing that’s gotten thinner are the screens. Look at the pictures again there is a huge taper on the bottom half of all but the white one on bottom. The screens have got thinner, the rest is just lies

Look at that top picture again. It’s not thinner. Look how much of a taper it has to make you think its thinner.

Looking at the bottom one, the back of the screen has gotten thinner compared to the others, but the bottom has barely changed. They lie to you, port thickness has zero bearing on how thin the laptops are, its all lies

It’s so weird you people find it acceptable/endearing to be terrorized by your pets.

And mutually beneficially so does UBI et al

Okay I’m done with this you are just being obstinate or intentionlly trolling me

Imagine how much healthier things would be if ads were illegal and using them was punishable by having your business auctioned off and the proceeds going to free legal services for the bottom 50% of society

Not at all. Never really have been though and it’s been 43 years so at least I’m used to it.

Thank you. Surprisingly unvulgar and not at all cynical

Ren : Hi Ren

Heh. My brother’s and i have beat it.

It wasn’t so much unfinished as they decided the problems with that particular level were worth keeping as it was. Classic it’s not a bug it’s a feature. They decided it was acceptable and added to the game even if it was not intended by design

Okay Ojay okay. Help me out. Why are you claiming that this is the question?

“The question was: how does someone find out something is peer reviewed”

Please literally show where you see this being asked. It was not asked in the top comment, nor is it necessary to ask. I don’t understand why you feel it is silly or unnecessary as it is very clearly used for a specific purpose when i read the top comment.

Again you are wrong. It was not the question of the top comment you responded to. That was a follow up question that is irrelevant because the comment you that started this discussion cleanly clearly and unambiguously removed any need to discuss how to find out if something is peer reviewed by the first words they started the comment with.

If it is peer reviewed…

And they gave an example of something that you could do to further verify a peer reviewed paper. You can replicate the experiment and get the same results but then offered an example where there might be a problem with only reproducing the results, to them anyway

No one said it wasn’t correct… Why did you even bring that up?!? You accused the person you first replied to it, describing a process that isn’t the peer review process, skipping that they used the process they described only on something that is already peer reviewed…

I was(perhaps a poor attempt) trying to be a bit silly but pointing out a mistake you made accusing them of something they didnt do. But you just dont want to let it go and keep drilling deeper. Its quite surprising to me you can’t just say, oh whoops, and carry on

Your reasoning doesn’t matter if it’s being applied to the wrong problem.

This is not about OP.

Okay i laughed

Has nothing to do with OPs question. You missed the very first sentence to the comment your first responded to

if its peer reviewed.

You kinda glossed right over that didnt you? Maybe an edit is in your future?

I dont have an answer other than vet with an authority you trust (be it wikipedia, a teacher a friend, a parent)

But this is not a stupid question. Its probably the most important question when making a decision in this modern techno era to have an answer for yourself

Thrills? You want thrills? Get to that one god damned level on battletoads. Good good did that put you on the edge of your seat

5 Man NHL '94