I mean, that is pretty close to the truth. Especially for people whose skill level is at “Firefox sucks at loading HTML sites”.

Well, what is it that you would like? Women usually go for stuff like the Sims, Stardew Valley or Zelda, maybe some of those are for you?

Do you want to play alone, are you looking for a group, …? The games I mentioned are usually played alone (Stardew can also be played with up to four friends) so they aren’t very social, but they are fun nonetheless.

Edit: Also PlateUp and Portal.

What can anyone alternately make about usage?

What? Ya can’t have access at all that; at what situation can ya fathomly have a want to access that?

If you ever do need it, just hit the ol’ fn+super+shift+q,z
If you ever need a ‘z’, just hit fn+alt+Ctrl+backspace.

Ezpz

Leaving the musky fields for where the sky is truly bluer.

What if I put a C-to-A Adapter on both ends? Is that okay?

The one thing that escaped the stabilising crash loop.

And somehow, all those crashes stabilised each other, allowing the plane to land safely. Only the pilot needed to change their pants afterwards.

This would be even funnier if there was exactly one $10 gift card everyone has to fight over.

A japanese fashion Brand? With bored ape on one end and concerned ape on the other, they seem to be center.

Well, evidently CrowdStrike are hacks, so…

No

What about the Bored Ape?

Or someone that does not trust a centralised solution as it is easily used to suppress people.

I wasn’t mocking your argument, I was agreeing with you and clarifying that my feeling was about who I’m most “irritated” with, not about responsibility or legal culpability.

Okay, sorry for that. It happens to me sometimes to be mocked without me seeing prior cause for this. Thank you for clarifying that.

If a shop can’t sell me cakes, then it’s inconvenient. If a hospital is not able to keep people alive, that’s where things get intolerable. Them not having access to their PCs is a hospital thing. If they cannot use them they should not use them. If it’s a cost saving measure at the cost of people’s lives, then I want heads to roll. Literally, preferably.

For the icecream, yes. If I want icecream and the shop doesn’t have any because of a power grid failure, then I blame the power company more. The generator would be overkill, as it needs constant maintanance and checkups; immense running costs. This would not be justifiable for something like ice cream.

The hospital needs to be way more thorough with their supply chains. This discrepancy of responsibilities towards patients/customers is why I thought I was mocked, sorry again for that.

I called the certification processes “lacking” because they are very often out of date, if at all applied, like you said. The timeframe for product certifications needs to be drastically reduced for software products. I am aware that those checks need time the developers often don’t have, but that doesn’t matter. If that is a crucial issue, then they should stay the fuck away from critical infrastructure.

You write shitty code and it breaks something? You should be punished accordingly.

You load libraries without checking each and every one and now something’s broken? You should be punished accordingly.

You load proprietary code and now something’s broken? You better checked the whole contract so you can punish the creators after you’ve been punished.

Software developers often have way more reach (over distance and over time) than they realize. They should be held accountable more like doctors or engineers.

You can be reasonable in your choice of words, but there are heads that need to roll. In this case it is not the one pushing the final button, but all those that created this system. Developers, Project Managers, Team Leaders, all the way up to the CEO. If the space to work in is so limited that the possibility of such pushes seems like a tolerable idea, then everything leading to this is broken. And people need to invest to make this right. Therefore there needs to be incentives, good and bad. To steer out of the current course there need to be very unfavorable incentives.

You can mock my argument by giving a ridiculous example. Once people die it will be too late. It’s why there was a time where people thought it to be a good idea to employ giant generators to keep the power in a hospital running even in case of a power outage. Or to have redundant systems in an airplane.

There is a need for adequate standards in the software world. Trusting businesses to create them will evidently kill people. Creating something like certificates for personal skills and products is severely lacking.

I can put the blame to your customers. If I make a contract with a bank they are responsible for my money. I don’t care about their choice of infrastructure. They are responsible for this. They have to be sued for this. Same for hospitals. Same for everyone else. Why should they be exempt from punishment for not providing the one service they were trusted to provide? Am I expected to feel for them because they made the “sensible choice” of employing the cheapest tools?

This was a business decision to trust someone external. It should not be tolerated that they point their fingers elsewhere.

I can laugh either for or at you, if you want.

I’ll pour one out for the frontliners.