Lols [they/them]

evidently they dont give much of a shit either way

im so glad that blizzards internal culture and conduct align with microsofts values enough for them to skip the hands-on approach theyve shown with other subsidiaries

sorry, but isnt that the exact reason they exist at all

i didnt voice any opinion on what the extreme or far left are, so i imagine you either didnt understand my comment or are being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian

no, it is the mainstream view on non-western far-left groups too

this is the mainstream view on the far-left

as far as im aware, no one is legally compelled to perform an abortion

thats practically the sole determinator

deleted by creator

where are you people buying your bulbs, i have not touched onein a year at least

because intent isnt relevant to a product that sells based on how well it keeps you engaged in practice

this article is garbage and built entirely on polygon misreading one word

deleted by creator

ill take your seething over a fine lol

is this a psyop? surely its a psyop

youd probably have a hard time naming one billionaire that hasnt done anything good

theyre still a shit thing to have, practically never got the money they have by being a good person and shouldnt exist in the same world as homeless people, starvation or massively underfunded public projects

it couldnt be, we just established that “Western “freedom of speech” doesn’t seem to extend to this kind of stuff in practice”

the most universal and common limits to free speech that people will come across on social media in the west are usually an iteration of ‘don’t be an asshole’

censorship is usually relatively lax on other fronts, and various sites will censor different things, whereas most every site will have basic enforcement of ‘don’t be an asshole’ rules

as a result the most crying about free speech will come from folks who got told off for being an asshole and are entirely incapable of getting over it

have you considered sodding off to an instance where being a lib is a bannable offense

its a bulky box trying to scrape itself through a hole that someone was already stuck in

no actually, since the conversation is explicitly about conspiracy to commit murder, arguing that any belief in enforcing participation in society constitutes that is explicitly saying that having laws automatically means killing people

you dont actually get to say ‘violence’ instead of ‘murder’ in a conversation about murder, and then pretend that you arent talking about murder

unless this is you admitting that communism is not actually a conspiracy to commit murder, in which case cool i agree!

being forced to participate in society is called following the laws of the country youre in

am i correctly understanding that you believe that enforcing the law automatically necessitates killing people? thats a pretty scary thing to believe, and in no way indicative of any particular ideology im sure

its also false, considering the continued existence of countries that have abolished the death penalty entirely

on a side note, can you explain why you moved the goal posts from ‘communists want to kill everyone’ to ‘well maybe not all of them but the ones that dont will never succeed’ to ‘well having laws means killing people’