You make some good points, but i cant resist the thought experiment:

Is there even an incentive for solving women’s problems? Patriarchy can use women to portray the ultimate evil; influencers can use that portrayal to criticize women, engage in rage bait, get attention and secure brand deals.

Capitalism can appease men to promote consumerism wrapped in misogyny. Corporations can capitalize on women’s loneliness and low self-worth.

I have noticed that women with low self-worth find meaning in work, which ultimately profits corporations, the money they will earn will be expanded on consumerisms/additions which again can be profited by capitalism and corporate.

The rich can have as many resources as they want, so why solve it? Other than individuals (women) taking matters in their own hands and rescuing each other I don’t think there is enough incentive to help women as community or whole

Safety first!

😆 never thought of this. But I just used them to fill up my Hotmail storage by emailing them to myself

Take pics of sentimental things of little value. Then throw out the thing and keep the pic

Where are the phish fans?

“…723 times”

Lockpicking

Yes!! I said it wrong ^_’

What do you call a fish with no eyes? A fsh

What do you call a fly with no legs? A walk

What do you call a deer with no eyes? No idea

What do you call a deer with no eyes and no legs? Still no idea

€2k uni fees? I paid that per semester, at a community college…where my husband is a professor and I got a 75% discount…and I’m in state (because for some reason that makes a difference)

No, but is says: “if buying isn’t owning then piracy isn’t stealing.”

The point the photographer claims they were making is that real is better than AI and creatives are better than programs.

I think plant-based is the diet choice and veganism is the lifestyle. I got corrected by someone who was plant based. They didn’t want to associate with vegans

I agree. It doesn’t cost a lot to buy lentils and make dal, but it takes time.

The problem is really our entire food system is geared towards profit and the excessive suffering that comes from that. If you want to eat meat a little more ethically…you have to spend more or have the time to raise animals yourself.

Vegans vs meat-eaters is distraction from humans vs industrialized food. Vegans are correct about the suffering of animals, but those that focus on preaching to convert would find their time best spent being compassionate to those that can’t make changes.

Some small changes include:

• have one more vegetarian day a week
• in a restaurant select the vegetarian entree or three vegetarian side dishes in stead of a meat main course
• buy from local farms if available
• make some mushy Peas for a lunch option
• meal prep (vegan/vegetarian food does freeze easily and is easy to reheat)
• if making a dish that contains ground meat substitute (homemade options below)

I mean to do it all at once is not easy. Making small changes over time can improve health and save money. Thinking about the suffering of the animals can be detrimental, because you may associate making vegan choices with thoughts of animal suffering. I used to subscribe to a vegan magazine, but half of it was amazing recipes, and the other half was distressing animal stories.

mushy peas (use margarine or olive oil instead of butter)

mushroom “forcemeat” and other substitutes

dal recipe

You’re not a terrible human if you eat meat! It’s not easy to change, but doing a little bit can go a long way. See if you can cut it down ❤

Séances for cow ghosts 🐄 👻

That took a turn I hope that suicide will be legal and safe before you have to make that choice.

Anarcho Syndicalist Commune

you lucky lucky bastard

Explain to me like I’m five, how does this?

❤

Advaita Vedanta with cat as Brahman. I could get behind this as a worldview.