Cool, maybe you should have provided that in your original comment, but that’s STILL a municipal ordinance, that specific parts not code and doesn’t reference a code like all the other parts. Please provide the actual code, not some pdf without code references.

Yet another laymen that’s conflating shit, what a shocker.

And you must be autistic to not understand this difference and still fighting, I’m just gonna block you now, bye troll.

Also says the person resolving their own comments in other peoples communities so the mods can’t see them, it’s also strange that you know about someone downvote brigading you, why don’t you report them if that’s what you think is happening? Or would you rather just be a troll instead causing shit by stalking g and harassing people? Sounds like you know about it since you do it yourself no?

Hey, do you notice how that document you provided doesn’t actually say anything about which way the fence faces…? No of course not, you didn’t actually read the thing and wanted to start another fight because you’re a troll. Too busy looking for other shit you missed the entire original point!

Yeah the codes have nothing to do with aesthetics, way to prove my point for me! Lmfao, you truly are an interesting one.

I pissed you off so much you’re going through my comments looking for fights now?

Edit, you must be autistic or something to be this petty and abusive, while also not comprehending what you’re even arguing about.

I managed to find an image of it.

And not surprisingly, it doesn’t use the word code, nor does it refer to any building codes either.

They use regulation, requirements and standards, none of those being codes, and all have very specific definitions so they aren’t confused. Yet moronic idiots like you still do it…. See, you’re a fucking idiot that’s conflating local ordinances with model building codes. Codes are for structural things, not aesthetics you muppet.

and these are zoning code requirements that specify how fences are built and there is a section about which way it faces.

You think zoning requirements are code…?

Your document doesn’t load, and sorry zoning requirements aren’t code, and I’m sure your PDF specifies that.

I knew you couldn’t find a code that states that, and you didn’t, but try to claim you did dude, sure.

As I said, laymen and the fact you think zoning bylaws are code is just fucking asinine lmfao. What a muppet. This is the EXACT thing I was referring to, and you go and prove it unequivocally for all of us. Fucking idiot lmfao, thinks zoning requirements are fucking code what a fucking idiot.

Your link is broken, but I can see it’s a PDF and its name, so I can tell that’s not by any stretch of the definition a code.

But I pulled up the “ordinance” that it likely would be referring (which still isn’t a “code”), and would you look at that, not one mention about what side it should “face”.

So again, laymen with absolutely zero understanding and this is the exact shit I’ve been taking about. You can’t even link the right thing, and it’s not even a code lmfao. But sure insult me to show how correct you are….

And still doesn’t link any, what a shocker.

And it’s not semantics, I know codes don’t state it, and local ordinances do, and idiots like you conflate them which makes any intellectual conversations about it nigh impossible.

It’s always funny seeing a lamen talk so confidently about something they have no actual understanding about.

But sure “codes” state that, so let’s see one than, please. So I can show exactly what you’re conflating as “code”.

There is no codes that say that, maybe local bylaws, but to say code is just pathologically and factually wrong.

But feel free to provide the code that says this, if you can find it, you kind of need to support asinine claims like that.

Also nothing about this picture or anything OP said has claimed to be from the USA, but even than, the model US building code has absolutely no specifications about what side a fence “faces”.

You realize CODES are entirely structural and would NEVER have a stipulation, like that yeah…?

So don’t confuse a local municipal bylaw/ordinace, with “code”, they a fundamentally different things, but of course a laymen like you would never understand a nuance like that.

Insults the person and is uncivil and asks what rule they broke. Maybe read the rules in a community before commenting…?

Lmfao. You’re an uncivil dick who started the comment off with an insult, I reported you for breaking more than one rule. And now you’re pissy since you’ve got caught being the argumentative dick and are being petty about being reported for your own actions.

Look in the mirror troll.

Google fortress style fence, it has rails on both sides and the fence looks identical on both sides. Sounds like you should maybe up your Google game yourself before calling someone else out.

You realize the world operates in multiple different ways yeah? Just because your backwards country makes you do something, that doesn’t mean it’s the norm across the world you muppet.

If the neighbor was being agreeable you would be splitting the cost on a shared fence. And access wouldn’t be an issue, you’re building a private fence, because your neighbor is a dick. So you can’t touch their property.

If you feel the need to insult someone because you can’t comprehend the difference here, well that’s on you.

But clearly you haven’t built many fences if you haven’t run into a neighbor that refuses you access. It’s why people build private fences… because the neighbors already a dick, and you think you can just talk to them and they’ll let you access their land…? Seriously?

There isn’t shared upkeep? If you want to maintain yours, you do, if you neighbor does they do. It’s a fence, you can literally leave it for 2 decades and it won’t do anything. Maybe paint your side once every 5 years. What upkeep are you referring to? If it’s like OPs picture and a couple of slats, I’m sure you could find the $10 and not need to bitch with your neighbor over the price of a coffee… yeah?

Now you’re stuck with the bill or fighting them over it.

You mean the exact situation as before that got remedied by talking to them and coming to an agreement…? Surely you could also do this with the new neighbors… no? Where I am you sign a covenant when you buy the land, if you don’t sign the convenant, while you don’t get to buy the land. Sounds like you maybe just live in a place that lacks civility in codes and laws? There wouldn’t be anything to fight over because you either agree when buy, or you sign it away. This is the norm everywhere I’ve built regarding shared fences, because you know permits and competent property management systems in municipalities figured this out decades ago. Get with the times America lmfao.

You’ve talked yourself in an entire circle in 2 comments dude.

It’s pretty normal to have fences on property lines, why pay 4x the price for fences? Talk to your neighbor, and build it on the property line as one single fence. Do some municipalities prevent that or something? I’ve never heard of that, but this is in Canada though.

Not two fences each 3 feet back so you can legally build it without trespassing, that’s just wild that’s a thing, sure that’s not fencing contractors trying to get more work with bylaw fudging?

Fences are short enough almost anyone can pull up to look over.

Who told you that’s a thing? Thats hilarous.

There’s a reason why the person is paying for a fence by themselves on their own property don’t you think? The person did, and the neighbor is being a twat, so now they need to pay double the price and lose property while the dick neighbor gets a free fence and land.

Yes that’s the solution, but obviously people are dicks and thats the situation that’s being talked about here.

Why the fuck do you think we are talking about civilized neighbors here lmfao?

If they don’t want it on the property line and they aren’t paying a penny, than nope, person paying gets the pretty side. Why would the neighbor who doesn’t own it or pay for it get the pretty side?

Also, you couldn’t install it without trespassing, so you couldn’t legally build it that way anyways

You would always have the pretty side if it’s your fence. You couldn’t attach the panels without trespassing on the neighbors property otherwise.

Mine has a filter light that comes on after a couple months or when it detects slow draining. Techs expensive and people buy cheap appliances. Than bitch that they aren’t fancy.

A clogged drainage filter will make it take longer than anticipated. It’s usually lack of maintenance when these timers get THIS bad.

But even different materials hold water differently, it’s all an estimate based off of averages. Washing bedding or wool items? Probably gonna be 15% longer.

Did you read the article? Because this is talking about save issue bugs, not a gold issue.

Even Bethesda Blizzard has a system in place to report this stuff, so it’s incredibly ironic you used them as an example….

How so? Someone looks at your save and fixes the specific issue related to it. You also have to report it for it to be able to be looked at and fixed as well dude…… how else would they know the issue or be able to fix it…?

The only difference is a dev getting some marketing out of it with this specific case. Every save issue bug is a specific issue that needs to be looked at, you are always getting “personal care” with these issues.