• 2 Posts
  • 121 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 29th, 2023

help-circle


  • It is a combination of this and the power of propaganda.

    When you can control the information that people consume, you can have a huge influence over what they think.
    If you can influence the thoughts of a big portion of the populous, you can create control structures. You use these control structures to move people into their emotional decision making more often. The more often you can keep people in their emotional decision mode, the easier you can control what they do.
    The thing is, the easiest way to keep people in their emotional thought mode, is to pull the fear and anger levers. Keep people afraid and angry, and you can steer society.

    The other problem with this is, the people who see through this kind of thing are not the majority.
    The people who can see through the techniques, are not always the traditionally “smart”; but higher intelligence is certainly an advantage.







  • There are so many pessimistic comments.

    To those who are saying, something along the lines of, aliens wouldn’t come because they wouldn’t recognise us as intelligent.

    That is a really stupid augment, even if they were significantly more intelligent than us, we still standout from all other minds on this planet.

    We literally study everything, just for the sake of knowledge.

    A high intelligence civilisation that has the ability to reach us, would also have to a high level of curiosity to archive that ability.

    To answer question posed. There are two ways to look at this:

    • if we assume that, at some point an alien civilisation will contact us, the next 10 years is as statistically likely as another ten year timeframe.
    • from a background rate, of the actual likelihood of being contacted at all. I have to say, it is exceptionally unlikely. The travel distances/times, and the time a civilisation exists for, all count against contact especially physical contact.

  • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nztoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlA/S/L
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    I’m wondering what exactly people raising privacy concerns are worried about?

    Even if I tell you my ASL, what can you do with that info?

    I’m usually very privacy aware.

    The big tech firms already have the information, it can also likely be brought on the dark web.

    44/M/NZ BTW. Even if I tell you which small town I’m from, it doesn’t get you to my doorstep.





  • Climate change.

    In the mid 90’s when the data was becoming more mainstream, I felt that there wasn’t enough info to make a decision on it, looking back from now there was but the O&G lobby was muddying the waters as much as possible.

    A few years later, ~97/98; I had read enough studies and seen enough data to accept that, yes; we were changing the climate, and yes; we need to do something about it.

    It has shaped a lot of the decisions I have made in the last 25+ years.

    BTW electric power tools kick arse.


  • I once long ago worked in the incoming mail department for are insurance company. It was basically data entry.

    Thing was, there wasn’t enough work.

    There were two teams of five, plus a supervisor for each team, and a manager above them.

    So what would happen was, we would arrive in and go to our spots, a few minutes later the main would arrive. Most days there was 100 pieces of mail to process, a really busy day may have twice this amount.

    Even the most complex items would take me 10 minutes to process. The bulk was around 3 minutes, given the above, could personally have processed all the mail on an average day, with 3hrs to spare for complications.

    On an average day, I got in the order of 30-40 minutes of work.

    On slow days, it was more like 20.

    I started coming in late, sleeping at my desk. Wandering around, going up to the upper management offices and the roof.

    I eventually got fired, after months of this behaviour. Not because I was underperforming, no! I got fired, because I was “effecting the moral of the team”

    I can see the point of why I was fired. I was an arse, I wasn’t suitable for the role.





  • How?

    I’m in NZ, we have a whole bunch of politicians to choose from, and it always comes down to who is the least likely to fuck things up beyond repair. It is not often that an objectively good candidate, everyone has their flaws.

    In this example the question is not is Harris an objectively good candidate, but is she objectively better than Trump?

    In my opinion yes, yes she is! Trump is the worst, the way he has emboldened the far right world wide is truly terrible.


  • 3 hours a day wouldn’t be that useful. You still have to “be” somewhere 5 days a week.

    What is useful; I did this for a few years; 3 x 8hr days. Mon - Wed, normal work hours, and a 4 day weekend. No need for “public holidays” even paid time off becomes less relevant, when you can switch one week to Wed - Fri. Leaving Thur - Tue as a “normal” way to take time off, giving a 6 day weekend possible every second week.