Old grumpy software architect and engineer. I create, perform, and teach music. I´m married, have kids, dogs, dabble in fine arts, and talk psychology, culture, and politics.
Seconded: CryptPad and Obsidian.
I like CryptPad by Framasoft, for big stuff.
Some web applications force me to open their screens in separate tabs and windows, by making the screens remove any filtering on revisit by back button. And thus I have 20 tabs open that all start with the same meaningless word.
No, they aren’t. You can switch to their Universe patches anytime, at your own risk. If you want Canonical to mitigate that risk for you, you pay. Simple, really.
All the good things Records bring are stifled by JPA and DAO conventions and requirements. I really hate JPA for that reason, and have avoided Hibernate in favor of my own DAO implementations.
Records will slash thousands of lines of code from my implementation and will make it infinitely easier to maintain, and trust down-stream.
Cool. Just what I need: yet another version of a JDK/JRE to test. I feel like I spend more time testing these for regressions than I spend developing functionality for my clients. Anyway. Good for Adoptium and those who found and solved this bug.
I started using Jakarta half a year ago, as it was promised to be the de-facto way to build a SOAP client that speaks to a WSDL server. Oh boy: growing pains. Did not expect that 2 decades of developer experience in Java EE would amount to nothing, for the people who implemented Jakarta. As impressive as the effort may be, the inexplicable regressions we faced when we got forced to upgrade to version 3 proved quite cumbersome.
So they say. Remember they also promised not to track users, keep trackers away, and keep your browsing experience ad-free. They came back from that within a year.
One would switch to a free JVM when other JVMs change their licenses from free to paid. OpenJ9 was the first free JVM to which I got introduced. Knowing it was based on the work by IBM, known for high performance and low memory footprint, it was a simple choice.
Vivaldi has no choice. They have built their browser on Blink, which is made by Google. Google will force them to comply. Their way out would be to go back to the Opera web browser, which they gave up on over a decade ago.
The effect those people will have on profit margins probably are negligible, given the large amount of people using Google-created web browsers already.
Great article. Well written, with just the right amount of detail for me.
Looks like a problem with your theme. Try a completely fresh profile with no themes installed.
The Windows 10 equivalent, Timeline, got discontinued in 2021. At this point in time it is unknown whether Microsoft will retrofit Recall into Windows 10. Knowing Microsoft it is safe to assume they’ll try anything for profit.