No, you just update the number whenever you make any changes to how many apples you have.

First method does not store the number itself anywhere. Let’s assume that you store apples. I come and ask you “How many apples do you have?”. To answer, you go and count every single apple one by one and return me the number. It’s very easy if you have a small number of apples, but if you have, let’s say, 5000 apples - you can see how long it may take.

Second option is you keeping a track of how many apples you have in stock by having it written down somewhere. If I ask you “How many apples do you have?” you just pull out your notepad and tell me the number. If you give me an apple, you just adjust the number you have written down already.

Getting the total number of all comments may be very resource heavy if there is a lot of comments.

If it’s just 5 comments, then the computer can quickly get them all from database and count how many of them are there. Now imagine if there is 50 000 comments and suddenly, you me and entire website ask “how many comments are there for this post?”

Suddenly the computer is overwhelmed by the request and you may end up crashing it due to amount of tasks it has to do.

It’s way faster if instead of all of that, the computer kept track of a number of all comments and simply adjust it when comment is added or removed. It does not have to get all the comments and count how many are there, just simply return the number and you are done.

But in the essence, you sacriface potential accuracy for speed. You may accidentally “desynchronize” the counter - if an user requests a removal of the same comment twice, and you don’t check if that comment was not removed. Or, in theory, if two separate users add or remove a comment at the same time. This is called “race condition”, which is common in multi-threaded computing.

Ok, so basically, there is multiple ways one could comment count. The most obvious option is to count the actual number of comments under the post. This might be in practice slow, as you must load all comments under the post. An alternative approach is to have a count variable for post, which is increased or decreased by 1 if post is added/removed. It’s way faster to retrieve that variable, instead of getting all comments and counting the number of them. The problem starts if some anomaly happens that is not accounted for, so for example, if I request the same comment to be deleted multiple times. So that counter can be decreased more than once for the same comment. This could be fixed pretty easily:

if comment_to_delete is deleted {
	// Do not do anything
	return
}

post.comment_count -= 1
delete_comment(comment_to_delete)

And yeah, I thought so too, but ever since I stumbled upon this bug, I think the way the comment count is stored is through the counter variable.

I accidentally made a post that has -3 comments.

This happens because Lemmy does not count the actual number of comments that there are under the post, but instead there is a counter per post. This is not necessarily a bad thing, but it does not seem like the counter is every synced with the actual count of comments.

My only gripe that makes me stay with Mlem is lack of any method of saving/sharing just the photo of a post.

EDIT: I meant Mlem, not Memmy.

…this is literally something an intern could write in a single afternoon.

I guess I am a cross between “Normie” and “Conservative”. I use macOS and Fedora daily, I watch MKBHD but also watch FOSS YouTubers. I use WhatsApp, but only because, in Netherlands, it’s impossible to live without it. I don’t use any Chromium, and I use Firefox, but I also use Safari.

Fuck getting labeled.

Well, in case of Gimp for Windows, it also doesn’t help that it uses a modified GTK. So, when you start on Gimp on Windows, the program must load all the GTK libraries first, while on Linux the shared libraries are already loaded.

It seems easy, but the moment you ask the user to “choose their instance” - you already push away a lot of untechnical people. What is an instance? How do I know which one is good? Will I be able to talk to people on other instances (look at Lemmy, some instances are blocked by other instances)? Why do I even have to choose an instance?

From an UX standpoint, that’s a disaster. Stuff like Lemmy or Mastodon will remain forever a niche, because of that.

EDIT: Typo

Okay, try explaining it to my 51 years old father. Or someone who really isn’t into tech in general.

Federated stuff will work for you and I - technically knowledgeable people. But we are a tiny fraction of population. The success of WhatsApp lays in its super simplicity.

Oh I think there is hundreds reasons to shit on Apple, but this ain’t one of them.

Great! If you’re technical and not have iOS. That’s already 50% of British market not using it.

Besides, it won’t help you if that’s a government mandate, and Google will be forced to take it down for the UK market from the store. Not a lot of people are installing apps from outside the Play Store.

Everyone commeting here saying “good, we will switch to X” is absolutely stupid. This law means no iMessage, no Signal, no WhatsApp, no Telegram, no secure encrypted messaging for anyone.

“Feels like I’m wearing nothing at all!… Nothing at all!… Nothing at all!…”

True, although I think it’s enough for most people.

You’ll soon be able to do the same with an iPhone too with iOS 17.

From my experience, if you keep declining yourself stuff like that, you are setting up yourself to fail. Have that pizza, just remember to not go and stuff yourself to the point where you can’t walk because you’re full. Remember to eat slowly too.

What’s the show?

She genuinely looks terrifying (whoever she is).