Thanks, will have a wank in a McD since that’s what you suggest

(I like your dumbed down version)

Ah you never know. Turns out I’m both being satirical and a certified moron

Not reading that essay

So this is why there is a “Block user” option. Thanks for clearing that up

Daily reminder that two different things can be bad at the same time.

I’ll get there eventually

Wow, the hubris is real. Ever heard of impostor’s syndrome? Because you obviously don’t suffer from it

Gadget Hackwrench

Congratulations to Gwyneth Paltrow and Benedict Cumberbatch for their baby

I wonder how failure is defined (maybe it’s in the article). Because SW companies don’t really care about making SW work, the only measure of success is selling SW teams to bullshit customers for as long as possible.

Lei Feng, the epitome of temperance? He was very fond of long and hard poles, or so I’ve heard.

(And I like how everything is slightly wrong in this meme. Too bad no one was purged in this list)

deleted by creator

They will rip your dick out, Jamie send that video of jacked hairless chimps

Lol your 12! Get in your grave grandpa

Well, you have to admit they are by far the best feature of bing

Ah OK, good point. I tend to forget that ‘good enough’ is not what other people might want in their measurements precision

?? It’s correct, what’s the issue here?

Yeah I won’t do that. Can’t go through the pain of showing them my account name. ‘Dad why are there all these x at the beginning and the end of your ridiculous name?’

Strangely enough, it’s the same user. Makes it even weirder in a way

Bold move.

It should be obvious since common sense tells that sponge beats gun and snake beats air

not reading that essay (/s)

It’s strange. The man pages contain everything you need to know and even examples ready to use. But people would rather try and fail several times. I wonder what inner motivation makes someone have this kind of process. Is there a reward when you manage to make it work through erring? Psychologists, do you know?