El Barto

Bring back anchovies.

Ah, that makes more sense now.

I don’t follow how you went from being concerned about using profanity in research papers because of audiences such as religious communities, to being concerned about LLMs spewing inaccurate things.

Has your original question always been about the latter?

I love the term too but I wonder how it’ll be used in situations where profanity is discouraged

Wikipedia synopsis is good enough for me.

Username checks out.

I guarantee you, this was not developed by tech bros. Just quick buck opportunists.

You’re one fine poster, and I like your discussion style.

Sorry if I sounded harsh at times.

I didn’t even think of how would neurodiverse people in the picture, and now you have made me think about things.

I didn’t downvote you, by the way.

But I’m curious: are you still talking about LLMs discussions that include profanity?

Or are you talking about something different, the fact that LLMs can spew bullshit, and that religious congregators should be informed about this?

I’m just an individual, so my opinion may be just that. My opinion.

To answer your question, families may ban the use of said words in the sanctity of their own homes, for example.

The only reason I may feel that curse words are inappropriate in any situation is because I’m already conditioned, from childhood, to think of them as “they may offend.” But if no such conditioning existed, I’d say they would be okay in any instance, because the words per se are not offending. The intent is.

Take, for example, an eulogy. A person speaking of someone who recently passed away, may say “Excuse me everyone, but gosh darn, why did he have to leave so soon? I feel like a failure, because I could have done more. I’m a failure!” Why should it be different from “Excuse me everyone, but fuck, why did he have to leave so soon? I feel like I fucked up because I could have done more. I’m a fuckup!” Really, the only reason we may silently gasp at the second version is because we were conditioned to “gasp” at those words while growing up. Not because the words cause actual psychological, irreparable harm.

You touched the topic of religion in other comments. I guarantee you that when God, before killing everyone with a flood during Noah’s ark times, I’m sure He at least, at the very least looked at the state of the “failed world” and said “well, shit!”

Which ones? The ones that allow raping of children by their leaders?

Or the ones that promote violence in their holy books, like killings and torturing to death? Oh, but the profanity! Not the profanity.

Lol!

Ok, troll.

Writing with AI?

😮

That’s… revolving.

I wasn’t trying to be an academic edgelord.

Followed by:

You have no valid point. [etc]

Sure.

Your comment is a sign of limited vocabulary, because you pretty much used words that everyone uses.

(See how your argument holds no water?)

I couldn’t care less about places in which profanity is discouraged.

If you’re going to be disrespectful, you’ll be so regardless of language.

For instance:

“You suck donkey balls”

vs.

(And bear in mind that I don’t use this term!)

“You’re mentally retarded”

No profanity in the second one. And yet, I’d feel like punching the person’s face who would say the second one to me. Not because someone would say that to me, but because I find the use of the label offensive in general.

So, fuck it.

Thanks!

A few, you say.

Care to list them, please? Or are they just Fairphone models?

Sure, but photos altered with AI is not the point of the article. In the article a photographer said that he suspects that the cropping/flattening tool he used somehow used AI, and therefore the AI metadata was included in the picture.

So, while the action using AI is “technically correct,” the photographer simply wanted to crop his picture; something that has been possible for decades without AI. He wasn’t aware of AI being used. And now Facebook includes the tag because of the AI over-engineered bullshit.

Personally, I don’t place all the blame on Facebook. They’re simply reading the metadata, and if the metadata says “yo, we used AI,” then welp, it gets the label. So, the editing tools are also to blame here.

I guess now I know. Before uploading a photo to Facebook/Instagram/whatever, I’ll make sure to remove the exif metadata.

Ha, cool! It’s been a while since I saw that movie.

Man, 1998?! Time flies.

What’s this in reference to?