I voted for Harris, but obviously that didn’t work out, did it? If you honestly think republicans would go back to the center after trump is gone then you don’t understand republicans.
I voted for Harris, but obviously that didn’t work out, did it? If you honestly think republicans would go back to the center after trump is gone then you don’t understand republicans.
I would get into fierce arguments on the internet to insist that we must vote for the lesser of two evils every election so that we get that dictatorship a little later instead of right now.
They got ignored by the people they petitioned for help.
Anti-genocide protesters did more than just pick up a phone and call. We all saw the result.
Panic buying like this only leads to more price increases. I just buy the minimum, like usual.
Both. It’s kind of like asking if monarchy is the problem or if the problem is just evil kings. Theoretically even a dictatorship can work out well for the people given a benevolent dictator. The issue is with the vulnerabilities inherent in the system. For capitalism, it’s that those with more money have more influence and thus it creates a feedback loop where those with more money have more power to get themselves more money and therefore more power and so on.
Not bad for a peak!
It felt better when VR was the hot new buzzword, right? Oh well, there’s the AI division also burning money, but at least it’s the current buzzword!
Worse, based on trends over the last couple decades.
No it isn’t. The image of mickey mouse was literally copied (hence copyright, literally right to copy). Regardless, that’s still IP law being violated so I don’t know how that helps your case.
If I include an image of mickey mouse (ripped straight from disney) in my application in a proprietary compression format, then the application decompresses that image and changes the hue (or whatever other kind of modification), then these are technically “transformations” but they’re not transformative.
Still, the AI model itself is not transformative, it is merely incorporating that data into its training set.
You mean like how the comment you responded to is one of the most upvoted comments on this post?
You’ve got the smug know-it-all liberal schtick down perfect.
My best guess would be intent, which I think is an important component of fair use. The intent of youtube poop creators could be considered parody and while someone could use AI to create parody, the intent of creating the AI model itself is not parody (at least not for these massive AI models that most people use).
and it’ll continue to fall, especially if they waste resources on dumb things like the cybertruck.
Nobody fell in love with biden in 2020. He was crowned the nominee because they told everyone that somehow out of all candidates he was the best chance against trump and democrats fell in line, just like they did in 2016 for hillary.
Evil motherfuckers tend to live forever, unfortunately. It’s the pure concentrated hate that sustains them.
This isn’t software that is exclusive to EVs.
Something to keep in mind when people are suggesting AI be used to replace teachers.