I’m in mastodon but I wouldn’t mind trying Bluesky when there are third party servers.

They never cared for privacy, it was all marketing. We should be equally suspicious of Proton and Tutanota.

Regardless if the guy is pro-Russia or not, banning masks in protests is very much an authoritarian move.

Oh I answered the wiremin asshole a bunch of times and they deleted their posts when I told how wiremin was suspicious as hell and shouldn’t be trusted.

I’m sure they won’t be any cheaper. Nvidia can be as greedy as they want given the low competition they have.

I’m guessing that it isn’t. So don’t use it.

this does not affect Google, Meta or any other Big Tech at all. This law was trying to break encryption or do some sort of client side scanning. And it didn’t got approved.

This does not force Google or Meta to encrypt your chats if they weren’t doing so. Or to remove their own backdoors in the encryption if they had them. It’s just a law that was not passed. So your comment does not make any sense.

PS: it’s not like Google or Meta care too much about encrypting the contents. They’ll happily take your metadata which is super valuable. This is what Meta does with WhatsApp.

I have to, the alternative is Windows, but I’ve also been exploring OpenBSD.

I’m actually pro LGTB and hate Wayland. Don’t make us all look as conservative scumbags. Some of use just hate Red Hat (IBM) because of their big corp nature.

C’mon, I specifically told that I deleted my comments because I didn’t want to discuss it and you response to that by bringing it up again?

I only commented again because OP accused me of harassing him, which I’m not doing. I’m not interested in talking about the video or Rossmann at all, because it’s just a waste of my time.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

this is not open source. from their license:

Subject to the terms of this license, we grant you a non-transferable, non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to access and use the code solely for the purposes of review, compilation and non-commercial distribution.

note how this explicitly leaves out modification.

You may provide the code to anyone else and publish excerpts of it for the purposes of review, compilation and non-commercial distribution, provided that when you do so you make any recipient of the code aware of the terms of this license, they must agree to be bound by the terms of this license and you must attribute the code to the provider

once again, they exclude modification of the code.

no forks can be made because they aren’t allowed to modify the app in anyway.

Additionally, the termination clauses say that they can just terminate your rights to use the code if they feel like it, no other reason needed. This is a direct attack against open source.

no. my problem with Wayland is that X worked on all POSIX compatible systems. But Wayland is Linux specific. Try running Wayland on Solaris.

Wayland is the worst thing that has ever happened to the Unix-like OSs. I’ll stick to X til I run out of programs that support it. And then, I’ll stick to the TTY and CLI programs.