• 0 Posts
  • 40 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 23rd, 2023

help-circle


  • psvrh@lemmy.catolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldHow diffrent OSes evolve
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    8 wasn’t nearly as bad as people think, and there were big improvements to the kernel that make it a definite improvement over 7.

    The problem for most people was the Start screen, which if you could get past, left you with what was a really good OS.

    Less ads and telemetry than 10, too.





  • Stable means different things in different contexts.

    Debian being stable is like RHEL being stable. You’re not jury talking about “doesn’t crash”, you’re talking about APIS, behaviours, features and such being assured not to change.

    That’s not necessarily a good thing for a general purpose desktop, but for an enterprise workstation or server, yes.

    So it’s not so much that Debian would replace Fedora, it’s the Debian would replace RHEL or CentOS. For a Fedora equivalent, there’s Ubuntu and the like.



  • I’m going to say Win8 & 8.1.

    Say what you will about the UI, they did great work on the underlying kernel, file system and APIs. If they’d continued to refine it, it’d be damn near perfect.

    They really started to lose the plot with 10; it kept a lot of what made 8 good (and steals a lot of goodwill from 8) but you can see the adware and telemetry start to creep in.

    The next best I’d have to give to Vista, which also did some much needed revitalization, only to see 7 get the glory because Microsoft flubbed the hardware requirements and vendors were sloppy with drivers.

    My favourite is NT3.5: full microkernel, no GDI in kernel space, no printer drivers in the kernel, less registry issues. We’d have skipped a lot of pain from the 90s and 2000s had Microsoft not went backwards with 9x and NT4.