Yes. The Americans ask this on every form for who knows what reason.

Twitter is not a free platform. It actively suppresses the voices of the left and protects the far right.

I do sincerely support free speech. I think it looks a lot more like the Fediverse than Twitter.

Most of my Tor activity is on onionsites, so that’s okay.

Also, even given spooky nodes, the chances of getting a spooky entry and exit node are slim. Still, given the possibility, it is advisable to do spicy clearnet activities away from home with a MAC randomizer as insurance in case you win the world’s worst roulette game.

Librewolf for normal stuff, Tor for stuff I don’t even want linked to my IP.

The guy left his company long before the shenanigan cascade

Don’t forget that Republicans consider pretty much anything featuring gays as sexual and pornographic.

:(

He’s Canadian

Kursk

This is an insult to punks

If you think about it, all files are binary, some just happen to be human-readable.

It’s success. Not huge success, but success. It maintains a mediocre status quo in the face of the possibility of it worsening.

I keep a webcam because I trust my personal computer far more than my phone when it comes to private comms.

Security is in degrees. The highest level would indeed use open-source hardware. I hope to build a rig like that someday.

I keep my webcam unplugged when not in use.

It’s C with feeping creaturism. Some of the features are good. Others not so much. Personally I agree with Torvalds overall.

I am indeed aware that philosophers are not a monolith. They are, however, way more likely to like Freud.

There are counter-trends, but there is a lot of Freudian shenanigans about. The fact that they are a major force bothers and intrigues me.

Your psychologists are Lacanian? And I thought it couldn’t get any weirder after being told you fellows get blue dollars from caves.

Look up “penis envy”. Or “Oedipus complex”. Or some of his views on women.

I get that for the artists, but what about the philosophers? Are they not big dick academics who will lose their standing if their ideas are nonesense?