For what it’s worth I wouldn’t mind banning cars but keeping guns.

Having guns keeps the working man having power.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_boxes_of_liberty

There are four boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and cartridge. Please use in that order.

The “cartridge” option is more important than almost anything else. Besides jury boxes and ballot boxes.

Some very good points, and well written

https://hobbycents.com/hobby-guides/driving-hobby-guide/

https://www.theintelligentdriver.com/2023/01/12/5-fun-and-interesting-hobbies-for-driving-enthusiasts-to-try-out/

Cars kill in the same numbers are guns, and are a hobby… just saying

How do you do " can make that happen and still get rid of"

Explain please.

Because I have the right to get a manufacturer that is not liable. Much like my ability to get a car is based on the fact that auto manufacturers not liable My ability to get a gun is absolutely reliant upon gun manufacturers not being liable.

You are not participating in a good faith discussion if you don’t acknowledge that making guns manufacturers liable will remove my choice to shoot paper.

You’re proposal will affect me, at least if you’re arguing in good faith.

I use guns to shoot paper. Your argument for what guns are created for is flawed. My gun is not created for the ending of human lives.

My gun was made to end paper from being completely without holes.

Are you saying that my use of the gun is wrong? Or am I allowed to have a gun that is not used for killing?

-Signed a bleeding heart lefty with a gun