I mostly meant the DNS sinkhole functionality that pihole is famous for using to block ads. You wouldn’t use pfblocker-ng for domain routing.
Here is a forum post from negate discussing what I think you’re looking for.
I mostly meant the DNS sinkhole functionality that pihole is famous for using to block ads. You wouldn’t use pfblocker-ng for domain routing.
Here is a forum post from negate discussing what I think you’re looking for.
I don’t know the answer to your question, but you can get the functionality of pihole directly in pfsense using pfblocker-ng
He doesn’t list what the mistakes will be. He said that he fears that because hardware people aren’t software people, that they will make the same mistakes that x86 made, which were then made by Arm later.
He did mention that fixing those mistakes was faster for Arm than x86, so that brings hope that fixing the mistakes on Risc V will take less time
Been dealing with this for years. It doesn’t get better.
This one?
You’re so edgy! I’m jelly…
I have no clue how the original Mad Max made it out of Australia, let alone spawn a minor cinematic universe…
I’m glad there haven’t been any pervs saying cheese pizza…
I really hope the people below this are just naive, and not actually pedophiles
That would make sense
I wonder why every version of the couch has a window on the right of the generated image
Why would it increase your energy bill?
That’s part of many people’s learning process. Meant of us, including me, have been there. Luckily, my last Windows computer was about 10 years ago. Good luck
I’m on Windows…that’s one variable I can’t change.
🤔
The Navier Stokes equations represent the universal laws of physics that can model any fluid in the universe.
These equations have been around since almost two centuries now but we still understand very little about them. When we have a set of equations we expect the following to happen-
Solution should exist- One should be able to solve the equations
Solution should be unique- Given particular initial conditions, one should obtain an unique solution to the problem. For example if you and your friend pour water into a container in an identical way, keeping all parameters (pouring velocity, direction, geometry and dimensions of the container, etc) identical then you both should get the same flow pattern. Water in both the containers should behave in exactly the same way. If your friend gets air bubbles at a point then you should get them at the exact same point as well.
Solution should be smooth- A finite change in the input should produce a finite change in the output. It should not be erratic and unpredictable.
Unfortunately, Navier Stokes equations do not satisfy any of the conditions mentioned above.
https://medium.com/@ases2409/navier-stokes-equations-the-million-dollar-problem-78c01ec05d75
Thanks for letting me know! I really wanted to look at the UI when I realized what I was looking at, at the park, but I didn’t want to bother the employee. I appreciate that I got to see it in that video now
That is definitely your Windows bias haunting you. Package managers are the way to get software on your Linux distro. Going straight to the source has it’s place, but for 95% of use cases, you should be using your package manager.
One of the beautiful things about Linux is it’s versatility. Many people want to use their hardware for things other than gaming. For instance, I saw a Steam Deck at Disneyland being used to operate “autonomous” robots in Star Wars Land.
For me, I have been doing the vast majority of my gaming on my Steam Deck ever since I got it, however, recently, I was wanting to do some programming work while I was out and about, and was running into a lot of road blocks trying to do it on my Steam Deck. They can be overcome, but I found myself thinking about how much easier it would be to do my work on it, if it had a different distribution installed.
The Steam Deck is a consumer appliance, and as such has reasonable safeguards in place to protect users from themselves. Some users want to go beyond what’s available out of the box, and I imagine that freedom is what motivates most people to put other operating systems on their device.
Different design paradigms. In 1969, they had one shot to get everything right, and prepared accordingly (not to mention, they had a massive budget since the space race was all part of the cold war).
SpaceX is taking a different approach, fail fast and cheap. They are taking an iterative approach that allows them to learn from previous failures, rather than anticipating what all those failures could be and then over engineering the rocket to prevent that.
They are different approaches, and each has their own pros and cons. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Sorry Americans…
The previous commentor already did that.
Assuming that you don’t have enough information on the topics that you want to learn about to even begin this journey without asking for guided help, then the place you need to start is understanding research methodologies.
There are plenty of free online resources that can teach you those skills for free. I am partial to MITs Open Course Work, but many universities offer comparable services.