Remember: militaries usually buy from the lowest bidder, so anything military-grade is probably low quality.
Also, email isn’t a great medium for communicating securely, since the other party has to be just as mindful about security as you; otherwise it’s basically security theater.
You could try [0-9] instead?
awk '/\/dev\/loop[0-9]/ {print}'
If you have a larger sample of input and desired output, people can help you better.
I see you point; but not even 200 years ago the people couldn’t imagine most people working in other “industries” than agriculture.
Historically, most people worked in agriculture. (I’m not sure of the percentage, but it was >80% IIRC, but we can take a low estimate at 50%).
Nowadays less than 5% of the world population works in agriculture, due to increases in automation (machinery that can plow and harvest), and better understanding of the process (more efficient use of land).
While some of that turned out to be bad for the environment (who knew biodiversity is good, actually?), it did free up most of the population to do other things.
I hope it’s not “AI” that will automate the future (because of the huge energy costs to the environment), but automation more generally could help us free more time for passionate pursuits.
Jobs like software engineer didn’t even exist a century ago, and who knows what kind of new jobs will be created in the next 100?
That’s already been going to the wrong people for decades now.
The least drastic solution would be something like UBI, where a lot of people would be miserable, but at least will be able to put food on the table. (In case you’ve seen The Expanse series, I imagine that something like the part where Bobbie asks for directions on Earth).
A more drastic solution would be to not tie the worth of people to the amount of work they do or the amount of wealth they have.
deleted by creator
Also, this recent classic: I will fucking piledrive you if you mention AI again was really illuminating.
I know that feeling all too wel…
Sorry I can’t help you with the solution you want, I don’t use flatpak.
It’s not really what you’re asking, but couldn’t you just visit the about:profiles page?
It’s not as nice as the dedicated profile manager, but it’s just as functional.
You could even set it as your default page, or add it to the bookmark bar.
Username checks out 🏴☠️
I will also never buy a spaceship /j
IIRC, within RHEL it goes fedora (next major) -> centos stream (next minor) -> RHEL (current major.minor).
With Debian and its derivatives (e.g Ubuntu) this means that Debian-unstable corresponds to fedora, Debian-testing corresponds to CentOS stream and Debian-stable corresponds to RHEL. (Roughly of course).
Ubuntu is based off of some flavor of Debian and is therefore downstream of it: Debian (unstable I think) -> Ubuntu -> Ubuntu LTS.
But as far as which version has the newest packages then sure, your list is correct.
Thank you, was wondering what happened there.
Youtube tip everyone needs to now: remove the si query parameter, it’s not necessary and used for tracking
From
https://youtu.be/LKCVKw9CzFo?si=06X6O91R9pX_8UbX
Into
https://youtu.be/LKCVKw9CzFo
people’s configs on github?
They’re making a new browser engine from scratch in an open way, absolutely amazing!
I do have several questions:
Why would they use BSD instead of GPL? If you care about open-source so much, why would you make it possible for a company to run away with your fancy new engine?
Why are they creating a new browser, when even firefox has to struggle to keep some semblance of market share? I get that not every project needs to aim to be “the biggest”, and that even a smaller project (in terms of users), can be fun. It’s just that writing a browser engine that can handle the modern web seems like an almost Sisyphean task; which makes me wonder what their motivation(?) is.
Why the FLOSS are they using closed-source proprietary discord as their main communication channel?
To quote the post more specifically:
Even as our species destroys its only home, we assume that the solutions to climate change must lie in technology, without stopping to examine the role that this very attitude has played in the crisis.
This is so deeply ingrained in our social consciousness that, when there is a new impressive technology, we assume that it must be here to solve one of our big problems. As the AI hype quickens the pace of our ecological devastation, we’re so dazzled by the technology that there is actual debate in supposedly serious publications as to whether AI is going to save us from climate change, despite all evidence pointing to the contrary.
Yep, it’s definitely better to have as a default
It is with zfs, but I not with regular mount I think (at least not by default). It might depend on the filesystem though.
You can also do the following to prevent unwanted writes when something is not mounted at /mnt/thatdrive:
# make sure it is not mounted, fails if not mounted which is fine
umount /mnt/thatdrive
# make sure the mountpoint exists
mkdir -p /mnt/thatdrive
# make the directory immutable, which disallows writing to it (i.e. creating files inside it)
chattr +i /mnt/thatdrive
# test write to unmounted dir (should fail)
touch /mnt/thatdrive/myfile
# remount the drive (assumes it’s already listed in fstab)
mount /mnt/thatdrive
# test write to mounted dir (should succeed)
touch /mnt/thatdrive/myfile
# cleanup
rm /mnt/thatdrive/myfile
From man 1 chattr:
A file with the ‘i’ attribute cannot be modified: it cannot be deleted or renamed, no link can be created to this file, most of the file’s metadata can not be modified, and the file can not be opened in write mode.
Only the superuser or a process possessing the CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE capability can set or clear this attribute.
I do this to prevent exactly the situation you’ve encountered. Hope this helps!
And don’t just fork it on GitHub, if the original repo gets deleted, any forks might too.
Also do a
git clonelocally, or set up a mirror on another host.