How refreshing.
How refreshing.
“Extremely thin” is pretty low on my list of features I want.
If making it a bit thicker gives me ethernet and HDMI then make it thicker. A laptop moves from place to place, and not needing dongles / specialist cables makes it far easier to jump on anybodies desk and just plug in.
You don’t give up ever.
You pursue a better solution whenever one presents itself.
I remember going to Auckland in the 90s and being amazed how low everything was considering it’s size. Wellington was vertical. Auckland was horizontal.
At least, that’s how it felt.
Investments in nuclear power are not taking money away from investments in solar.
This is interesting. Why do you think that?
I would disagree, because is see investment capital as finite. There are only so many investors able to operate at infrastructure scales. And therefore I see nuclear’s true cost as opportunity cost.
In the UK and a city? Probably Liverpool and because of The Beatles.
A Town? Well it certainly used to be Lockerbie where Pan-Am flight 103 crashed after a terrorist bombing just before Christmas 1988. It was on it’s way from London to New York.
Probably not known by the younger generations though.
Motorcycle at 16.
The land thing isn’t anywhere near enough of a concern for me, especially when dual uses of land are quite feasible.
24/7 is just about over commissioning and having storage. Build 10x as much and store what you generate. At those sorts of levels even an overcast day generates.
Storage. It’s all about storage. In exactly the same way that our water is handled. We have reservoirs to handle the times when natural water supply is low.
You’re using factors of less than 10 to argue against a factor of 100.
Where do you want to put your hazardous waste again?
Finland with it’s vast swathes of frozen tundra.
$60k per MW or $210M for a nuclear reactors worth (3.5GW). Sure… the reactor will go 24/7 (between maintenance and refuelling down times, and will use less land (1.75km² Vs ~40km²) but at 1% of the cost, why are we still talking about nuclear.
(I’m using the UKs Hinckley Point C power station as reference)
So more how newsgroups fell, because ISPs didn’t want to run the servers due to storage.
Ah, so you’re a waffle guy!
<sigh> stop with the “right-wing ideological white men” thing. It’s not political at this point.
A lot of “racially aware” writers seem to have ended up in a headspace where they can’t write white without making them a punching bag. It’s obvious. It’s childish. It’s racist. People of all races will be angry when their only representation in a piece of work is a lazy stereotype. You don’t need to be right-wing for that.
You can say “well now they know how it feels”, but that just means you’ve also sunk to the lowest level.
Unless race is critical to the plot, there’s no need to lean into it. Emphasising division breeds division. Just write a good story.
I was going to say something similar, but thinking everyone is “cunt”.
Yes, it’s gender neutral.
I really wish running your own mastodon was as accepted as running your own email server. There’ll be no “blue check mark” problem if your company runs the server and only provides accounts to employees.
No. The have nag screens for donations, but they don’t block on principle.
Following links, 3 websites later, Windows exe. RX 7900 XTX only (from the consumer card line).
Come on AMD