Can’t pick just one so here’re a couple.
“Crypto” used in the context of cryptocurrrencies. “AI”, referring only to LLMs. “Research”, referring to an indeterminate amount of reading up on the topic at hand, such as in the phrase “do your own research” that’s being bandied around in some communities.
This is where you’d normally go “there must be a better way…”
Some anti cheat work better than others, and it depends on how much you’d like to play the game that needs it. Plenty of games without.
EAC does not hide its process and you can see it running. If it’s not, perhaps it has left files behind, but that’s a Windows issue more than EAC’s.
there’s no way for users to reliably remove it
I’m not sure if this is true for the ones backed by the larger companies, like EAC. It’s possible to completely remove EAC using their installer.
Games like valorant are filled with cheaters despite using kernel anticheat
In my experience, this is untrue. Valorant isn’t “filled” with cheaters in the same way Apex Legends is.
Lots of other games to play.
LLMs are not Large Medical Expert Systems. They are Large Language Models, and are evaluated on how convincing their output is, instead of how accurate or useful it is.
Coca-cola definitely advertises, famously Santa Claus, but did you also know they do more subversive things like trying to shift the blame for obesity onto the victims?
Why did they have to appropriate the name of another algorithm that has little to do with LLMs for their company? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimax
The colour palette they used was low contrast, so in a quite literal sense nothing really stood out. It’s a mystery why they made the game’s presentation like that since the game was otherwise sound.
I love my Vader 3
If you’re writing a novel simulation for a non-trivial system, it might be best to learn to code so you can identify any issues in the simulation later. It’s likely that LLMs do not have the information required to generate good code for this context.
ChatGPT, thinking to itself: “Got’em!”
Edit, because it’s a personal peeve: anthropomorphizing statistical models is silly, they don’t think nor feel, but I thought this was funny.
Technically speaking, I guess bricking a device still counts as successfully disabling SecureBoot.
At some point they’re going to try to evade detection to continue scraping the web. The cat and mouse game continues except now the “pirates” are big tech.
These need to be washable, otherwise every time I accidentally wear them into the shower I’m going to have to buy another pair.
I prefer the term Digital Restrictions Management.
Is anyone surprised by this? Their entire business model is based on tracking people so of course they’ll want to de-anonymize users.
Not sure why you’re being downvoted for providing good advice about avoiding media bias.