In an open letter published on Tuesday, more than 1,370 signatories—including business founders, CEOs and academics from various institutions including the University of Oxford—said they wanted to “counter ‘A.I. doom.’”

“A.I. is not an existential threat to humanity; it will be a transformative force for good if we get critical decisions about its development and use right,” they insisted.

  • nanoobot@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It makes my blood boil when people dismiss the risks of ASI without any notable counterargument. Do you honestly think something a billion times smarter than a human would struggle to kill us all if it decided it wanted to? Why would it need a terminator to do it? A virus would be far easier. And who’s to say how quickly AI will advance now that AI is directly assisting advancements? How can you possibly have any certainty on any timelines or risks at all?

    • axum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Put down the crack, there is a huge ass leap between general intelligence and the LLM of the week.

      Next you’re going to tell me cleverbot is going to launch nukes. We are still incredibly far from general intelligence ai.

      • nanoobot@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I never said how long I expected it to take, how do you know we even disagree there? But like, is 50 years a long time to you? Personally anything less than 100 would be insanely quick. The key point is I don’t have a high certainty on my estimates. Sure, might be perfectly reasonable it takes more than 50, but what chance is there it’s even quicker? 0.01%? To me that’s a scary high number! Would you be happy having someone roll a dice with a 1 in 10000 chance of killing everyone? How low is enough?

        • axum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But like, is 50 years a long time to you

          I’ll be dead.

          but what chance is there it’s even quicker? 0.01%? To me that’s a scary high number! Would you be happy having someone roll a dice with a 1 in 10000 chance of killing everyone? How low is enough?

          The odds are higher that Russia nukes your living area.

          • nanoobot@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well I wont be, and just because one thing might be higher probability than another, doesn’t mean it’s the only thing worth worrying about.

            • averyminya@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The likelihood of an orca coming out of your asshole is just as likely as a meteor coming from space and blowing up your home.

              Both could happen, but are you going to shape your life around whether or not they occur?

              Your concern of AI should absolutely be pitted towards the governments and people using it. AI, especially in its current form, will not be doing a human culling.

              Humans do that well enough already.

    • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And how can you be certain, if the virus generation its an actual possibility, there won’t be another AI already made to combat such viruses?