• r00ty@kbin.life
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Same as every other technological innovation though. Productivity goes up. Revenue goes up. Pay goes… No wait, I must have got something wrong here.

  • Phoenix3875@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Salary and working hours have little to do with productivity though. It’s all about the workers’ negotiation power. We have many technology breakthroughs in computers that have nothing to do with AI and see where we are now.

    • Wats0ns@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not arguing that they haven’t little do to with productivity, I’m arguing that they shouldn’t have little to do with productivity

  • Poob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone who thinks chatbots are going to make life better for worker shlubs hasn’t been paying attention for the last 200 years

  • T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Has that ever historically been the case? It’s usually been that a technological development results in loss of jobs, as businesses simply reduce their wage expenditure, whilst expecting the same amount, or more work.

    Like how computerisation has massively increased productivity, but wages and working hours haven’t changed to match.

  • dexx4d@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Getting some gains out of it, but I’m still limited by the fact that I can’t put anything proprietary into any AI tooling. Not motivated enough yet to roll my own.

    For generic Q&A/searching, templating, etc, it’s been a decent stackoverflow replacement.

  • Leeennaaaaa@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It will! For people who already don’t do work because they implemented the AI strategy for developers. Clearly, if productivity rises the managers did good!

  • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really think we’ll start seeing actual improvements as open source alternatives replicate corporate functionality. Existing options are a mess (particularly in a professional setting) for folks to try to implement as they have unstable business models and dubious ideas about intellectual property. See OpenAssistant for an example of where I think these models are headed.

  • b3nsn0w@pricefield.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    me. i slack off 6-7 hours a day and use copilot to do the tasks in the remaining 1-2 hours. (at least i think that’s the ai and not my untreated adhd…)

    in a few years, some genius will do a four day workweek experiment, people like me will forget to only work 4-8 hours instead of 5-10 per week because the amount of tasks is the same, they will conclude that there’s no reduction in productivity, a benefit of four day workweek will work as an incentive instead of a raise to keep people around a bit longer, and it will start becoming a standard. and voila, we got the working hours reduction officially.

    i’ve already heard buzz that negotiating a four-day work week doesn’t tend to involve a 20% salary cut (probably because people are already slacking off a lot). i’ll have to research that more though, because at some point i’d do it even if it did result in a 20% cut, and time is so much more valuable tbh.