• magnetosphere @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 year ago

    “It will not record audio, and it will not use facial recognition,”…

    YET

    The NYPD does not own the robot, Adams said, but is in fact leasing it from the Knightscope company…

    A company which I’m sure is 100% ethical, and has no ulterior motives whatsoever.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t believe for half a second that it’s not going to use facial recognition and record everything. What they mean is that those recordings won’t be available for public review when the thing messes up and harasses people who are just going about their day.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 year ago

    "I’m hoping you’re going to put a line in your story about how cost-efficient I am,” he continued. “This is below minimum wage. No bathroom breaks, no meal breaks. This is a good investment, so please make sure that’s added to the story, okay?” [the mayor said]

    The mayor was enthusiastic about the cost-effectiveness of the robot. “I want you guys to be extremely creative in your writing style to say ‘Eric, job well done,’” he told reporters.

    This guy is special, isn’t he…

    The whole article basically lights it as a waste of money, since “[the police robot’s] effectiveness is unclear”, how there’s “no public evidence about actual crime reduction”, and how the “robot [needs] to be accompanied by a human officer at all times”, negating the need for the robot altogether.

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    The NYPD will do literally anything and everything they can to make sure cops don’t actually work. 

  • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    However, the K5 does have a button that connects you immediately to a live person, that New Yorkers can utilize 24-7, with questions, concerns, or to report an incident if needed

    So security cameras and one of those blue light emergency intercom things.

    • Butterbee (She/Her)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      That might be handy if we didn’t already live in a day and age where everyone is carrying a device that can put them in touch with a live person 24-7.

      • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not literally everyone, and people do have batteries die. I’m all for putting those call stations at regular intervals in public transit and other areas where it’s plausible they’d be used.

        I’m less sure the utility of serving the same functionality, but with a much more expensive robot. Realistically the entire purpose is to normalize people to seeing them as police officers, and I’m skeptical that that’s a positive.

  • Icalasari@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t care that it’s being babysat, I’m still betting on it being stolen is a when, not an if

    • papalonian@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh man. My old Walgreens had these and I begged the manager at my new store not to let them put them in. They still haven’t made their way over yet, maybe the company realized how absolutely idiotic they are.

      The only reason they wanted them is because when someone wasn’t standing directly in front of them they would play full screen ads for whatever was (supposed to be) inside.

  • ConsciousCode@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    So how long until people start advocating for the nonhuman, nonsentient robot over actual PoC? “Silicon lives matter”?