I love Chromium on Android, but not having uBlock origin makes me stick with Firefox (or Mull).

  • darrsil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    For exactly the reasons you state - Google doesn’t want ad blockers in their browser.

    • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.idM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wonder why they haven’t nuked them on desktop Chrome then, where extensions are a plenty?

      Is mobile a much more juicy fruit for their advertisers, or is it like said elsewhere in here more a technical thing?

      • GalataBridge@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wonder why they haven’t nuked them on desktop Chrome then, where extensions are a plenty?

        Extensions are so popular on PC browsers, that Google could really jeopardize their dominant market share, if they were to completely remove extension support. The press would be on it for weeks and there could be a real hit on user numbers.

        I think that Google rather tolerates the small number of users who use extensions and doesn’t want bad PR for Chrome on PC.

        But I wouldn’t be surprised, when Google tries this in the future, when their browser market share is over 90%.

        The game is different for mobile though – here we have a much bigger majority of unexperienced users who likely have never heard of browser extensions or such possibilities as easy-one-click-installation of ad-blockers.

      • darrsil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably because the cat is already out of the bag there. Hard to reign them back in and they’d have tons of bad press if they do that.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just use Firefox and ublock anyways, since chromium has a neat monopoly on the web. A monopoly on browser tech is terrible for the web.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, I’ve also found Firefox to have a few breaking bugs that make the experience basically unusable in mobile.

      Things like the browser engine(?) crashing, causing the page to be soft-locked on a blank page, and running poorly compared to its other counterparts.

      Which is rather a shame, since it would be much more usable and promising if they fixed those issues.

      • Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Weird, what device? I have a fold 4 and it’s been pretty solid, save for this occasional URL bug.

          • Wahots@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That should be fine, I was on an s9 and it was pretty solid on that. Sorry you are running into issues! (Keep that note 9 as long as possible, I still miss the lack of expandable storage and having a headphone jack on my device)

  • Madis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Outside Chrome, the answer is that the extension support is a very big and fragile (hard to maintain) patch for Chromium.

    Here’s a list of browsers with extensions:

    • Kiwi and Yandex browser support most Chrome extensions
    • Firefox, Mozilla’s Reference Browser and Firefox forks support most Firefox extensions, but you need to make a “collection” if you want more variety than the default list
    • Samsung Internet supports some content blockers as app-based extensions
    • SmartCookieWeb, Berry Browser, Sleipnir support userscripts
    • Many other browsers also have some form of tracker and/or ad blocking