• Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s 1100 of 6400 employees. I’m sure there’s little rhyme or reason to who got cut and who ‘survived’.

    I love the article highlighting how much the CEO made last year as he discusses this measure of last resort.

    Useless trash CEO wrecking a company rather than just taking a pay cut.

    • thann@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m pretty sure the CEO makes more than all of those employees combined

      Laughable to think he’s doing more than a sixth of the company lol

  • CluckN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do you think they were going to layoff 1093 employees and thought, “screw it let’s find 7 more to make it even”?

    • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      More like their analysts advised laying off 7 and the execs replied, “Laying off 10 is gonna be easy, no one’ll care about a measley 100 layoffs. No public outcry at such an unimportant 1000. You heard the man! 1100 it is!”