• Engywuck@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Everybody with basic reading abilities already knew that “incognito” is just “not saving stuff locally”. Sites can track you regardlessly. With any browser.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      99.99999% of users don’t know this… People who work in IT knows it and that’s about it.

      This is also why Google search is still popular too, people don’t know about any alternatives and are afraid to use something else even. They don’t even know why they may want to use something else. It’s ridiculous.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Google search is still popular because it works the best for most people. Bing and the others pretty much suck.

        I know I’ll get downvoted but it’s true. I try to use DDG where possible, and I’m not paying for Kagi. It’s quite expensive and I’m not too sure I’d like it. Half the time DDG doesn’t find something Google easily finds.

        And yes I know Google is worse than it was like 3 years ago, but DDG results are way worse.

        • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Fyi: this also depends on local factors and the kind of stuff your looking for.

          In my experience ddg is awful which is strange cause its powered by bing results while Bing result are ok, on par with google for searching and finding websites/services

          Startpage wich is deanonimized google works great on premise but its unusable If you want to find local services/stores or governments sites. (It makes total sense though, its the tradeoff of sharing location data). At some point the top result was a starbucks on the other side of the planet and i had actually provided the settings with my nationality and main language.

          Google remains king when it comes to digital shopping, results list almost all the major local retailers for me. Bing seems to pick favorite more selectively.

          In all seriously of late the tools ivebeen the most happy with are:

          • wikipedia search
          • wolfram alpha
          • gpt-4 (with healthy skepticism)

          I seem to be naturally moving away from search engines in favor of just a few bookmarked sites where the real content is. Most of the internet that i havent seen is either not my thing or feels dead

        • Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          When did you try DDG? I’m newer to it and have heard it get alot of grief but I’ve never had much issue.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Pretty much daily. On my phone it is my default search engine but it often doesn’t work out for me.

            I gave up with that plan on desktop and reverted back to google as default since it seems especially bad at finding software solutions, and I’m doing most of those searches for my job and side projects on my desktop.

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Well I used the Kagi free trial and loved it, and now I’m a very happy subscriber. It’s better than everything else, and it’s not owned by shitty big tech as a bonus. :)

            • 1984@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Yeah you get 200 free searches I think, enough to see if the results are better for you. You can also raise or lower or remove certain sites in the results so you can get rid of the sites you never want to see.

              I love their listacles format too when searching for best movies or car reviews etc.

      • Engywuck@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, but “not knowing” is not (entirely?) Google’s fault.

    • Whom@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I can imagine a reasonable user who doesn’t look into it beyond the old warning text being aware that incognito’s purpose is to not store browsing history and therefore assuming that somehow impacts Google’s ability to know where you’ve been. Like, they might know it doesn’t stop trackers but assume not having the history logged means it’s not there for Google to take. Or speaking more generally, they could’ve taken it to mean “we won’t track you, but we can’t do anything about others doing so.”

      I wouldn’t say it just relied on basic reading abilities, as you could easily be misled if your mental model for how tracking and data collection works was just a bit off.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes, often misunderstood, you do the same with Cookie Autodelete or Site Bleacher extensions.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The change is being made as Google prepares to settle a class-action lawsuit that accuses the firm of privacy violations related to Chrome’s Incognito mode.

    This won’t change how data is collected by websites you visit and the services they use, including Google."

    The stable and Canary warnings both say that your browsing activity might still be visible to “websites you visit,” “your employer or school,” or “your Internet service provider.”

    We asked Google when the warning will be added to Chrome’s stable channel and whether the change is mandated by or related to the pending settlement of the privacy class-action suit.

    Incognito mode in Chrome will continue to give people the choice to browse the Internet without their activity being saved to their browser or device."

    On December 26, 2023, Google and the plaintiffs announced that they reached a settlement that they planned to present to the court for approval within 60 days.


    The original article contains 545 words, the summary contains 154 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Elise@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Honestly I thought it would send out a no tracking flag. I wouldn’t be surprised if it is or will be illegal to ignore that flag in some jurisdictions.

  • BlanK0@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I don’t even use google anymore, I am currently using brave search (actually pretty good).

    Not sure in terms of privacy if they respect that much but in my perspective brave aggregates results by themselves instead of just using the google or bing results so they are at least a decent alternative.

    Also the ai integration has been good in the search results imo.

      • fl42v@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Although, I believe that’s about their browser. Also, ddg’s browser was far from advertised, as far as I remember.

        In other words, librewolf/arkenfox. Maybe also ungoogled chromium, but seems like too much of a hustle to me.