any help is appreciated.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Samsung has it on OLED screens.

    For OLED it takes very little power to dimmily illuminate a small area of the screen and the rest is the same as it’s off.

    So you can do stuff like have a clock always display without having to drain your battery as much as always having the screen “on”.

    But this is Apple, so who knows if they mean the standard definition or it’s like Musk’s “full self driving” that cant drive itself.

    • CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s the same thing. I used to have a Samsung with an always on display and loved it, so I was thrilled when iPhone finally got it after I switched over.

      Same deal, OLED screen, you can use it for the clock, date, weather, whatever.

    • LordOfLocksley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Apple always on = 100% screen brightness 100% of the time.

      If you want Dimmed always on, as you described for OLED, that’s a $19.99/month subscription

  • Naja Kaouthia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Always on, idle idle Always On display

    Always on, in use active Always On display

    The display runs dimmed unless you’re actively using it. During certain Focus settings, like Bedtime, the display turns off completely unless you wake it intentionally.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Recommend that you go to Settings > Display & Brightness > Always On Display and uncheck “Show Wallpaper”

      This will make it so the display is mostly black when not in use. Black pixels don’t use power on OLED screens, so it will help boost your battery life.

      Or, leave the wallpaper if you’d rather.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        And hide that glorious wallpaper? Pfffft

        (Actually kind a jealous. I’m boring. My background is straight black. Mostly on account of icons and readability.) (okay, so I grew up in the 90’s wallpapers aren’t supposed to be fun.)

        • Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I grew up in the 90’s wallpapers aren’t supposed to be fun

          I, and my child self fooling around in Windows 3.11 back in the day, beg to differ.

      • Naja Kaouthia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ah, thanks. It’s absolutely not mine and I can’t give credit because I honestly can’t remember where I appropriated it from but it’s cartoon Ragnarok. It’s cropped down a bit on my phone otherwise it scales a bit weirdly but this is the whole thing. cartoon Ragnarok

      • Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Did you zoom in? It’s AI crap that doesn’t make sense once you’re close.

        • SolOrion@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          That is very good AI art, if it’s AI art. Pretty sure it’s Norse mythology inspired- I think the snake is Jormungandr and the lil dude with the hammer is Thor. So it might be AI making the art weird or it might be the source material making the art weird lmao

          • Glide@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            They legit don’t have any faces or arms. That “Thor” has a weird, flesh coloured, Megaman buster-shaped appendage, no eyes and a gaping hole of a mouth.

            It’s not obvious at a glance, but each of those “characters” are amorphous blobs. Seriously, zoom in even a little, it’s really strange to look at.

            I appreciate the poster demonstrating always-on to OP, and I’d never criticize them for using this wallpaper, but the only way you can call this “very good AI art” is by glancing at a thumbnail and moving on.

            • SolOrion@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              I just assumed it was a weird minimalist style or a terrible quality photo making it look weird, honestly. I didn’t examine it closely.

              Looking at it on desktop, wow the faces are awful.