Google’s recent search updates promised a more intuitive experience, yet users are reporting strange recommendations, like suggesting glue for pizza, highlighting AI’s growing pains in refining context and relevance in search results. This situation points to the ongoing challenge of balancing AI advancements with accuracy in practical applications. For more on AI advancements in user experience, check out ChatDansk https://chatdansk.org/.
Started paying for Kagi. I’m done with Google or Bing.
What about Firefox? Can’t say that I’ve ever heard of Kagi myself, what makes it so special?
Well I guess the main difference would be that Firefox is a web browser not a search engine lmao. Fuck kagi though, CEO/owner is an antisocial lunatic
Why would we believe the promises of the ones who ruined the primary utility of their core product in the first place, and convinced or blackmailed the rest of the internet to take part in the ruination ? An advertising corporation will tell us to put cyanide on our pizza if it makes them an extra buck this quarter, and google is worse than that. Profit despite the social costs is doing no evil /s
Great insights on this topic! I appreciate the detailed explanations and practical tips. Looking forward to more posts. Keep up the fantastic work! Website : http://chatgptsvenska.org/
Copilot gives a four step solution then finishes with “glue is not the answer”.
They wouldn’t need to ‘improve’ their search experience if they never enshittified the results page like 10 years ago.
