• poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    17 days ago

    I didn’t claim that it wasn’t open-source. And a 3rd party bridge doesn’t make it compatible with ActivityPub.

    • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      Seeing the reaction to the bridge, it seems that most Mastodon users don’t want AtProto to be compatible with ActivityPub.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 days ago

        If Bluesky was just another ActivityPub using site you could just defederate from it. This isn’t really possible when there are many bridges that relay messages.

        But you also seem to have completely misunderstood what people objected to about the ATProto bridge. It wasn’t the optional possibility to reach people on Bluesky. It was the automatic opt-in that most people objected to.

        • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          By using the Fediverse, you implicitly opt in to having your content federated between different platforms. How is this any different?

          • poVoq@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            Not between platforms but within the Fediverse. Bluesky is not part of the Fediverse.

            • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 days ago

              The Fediverse is, by definition, anything that supports ActivityPub. If BlueSky supported ActivityPub – which is what the bridge was meant to accomplish – then it would be a part of the Fediverse.

              • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                16 days ago

                A bridge by definition does not make Bluesky compatible with ActivityPub and also does not make it part of the Fediverse. There used to be bridges to Twitter as well, but that doesn’t mean Twitter supports activitypub or is part of the Fediverse.

      • Jupiter Rowland@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        Many Mastodon users are against both Bluesky and Threads federation because they want the Fediverse to remain only Mastodon.

        Little do they know that the Fediverse has never been only Mastodon.