Clickbaity title on the original article, but I think this is the most important point to consider from it:

After getting to 1% in approximately 2011, it took about a decade to double that to 2%. The jump from 2% to 3% took just over two years, and 3% to 4% took less than a year.

Get the picture? The Linux desktop is growing, and it’s growing fast.

  • limer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    21 hours ago

    When it gets to 7%, is that when there is more malware designed for Linux desktop ?

    • majster@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      17 hours ago

      There is already plenty of malware targeting devs on Linux where is it’s strongest userbase.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yeah, unfortunate to rain in the parade but GNU/Linux definitely needs some attention sooner rather than later. Plenty of design benefits, but also plenty of pitfalls from an OS sec POV.

      Average users aren’t installing SELinux or Qubes so I hope no-one was actually going to reply with what Linux can do as opposed to the everyday user experience.

      A few years outdated, but relevant: https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/linux.html

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        but also plenty of pitfalls from an OS sec POV.

        Can’t possibly be more vulnerable than Windows, the system where you can elevate yourself to highest privileges by simply clicking “Yes” on a prompt without a password, and where most users are running outdated versions of their software because they never update anything, or have a thousand background “updater” applets that are scheduled to run periodically and have the ability to install arbitrary executables from their servers.

        • squaresinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          If you run a repo-only system, where everything you install comes from the first-party distro repo, you’ll likely be fine. Just as you are on Windows or Android if you only download apps from the first-party store.

          But like on Windows and Android, you’ll quickly reach the limit of what you can do with first-party store only.

          Especially stuff like gaming requires non-repo/non-store stuff pretty quickly, and then you are on exactly the same turf as on Windows.

          • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            where everything you install comes from the first-party distro repo, you’ll likely be fine.

            Canonical’s Snapcraft has a bad reputation for a reason. Many reasons. But compromised apps is a major one.

          • kadu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            12 hours ago

            There’s no world where Windows users only use the official store. In fact, that’s why every “S” version of Windows always failed.

            • squaresinger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              Exactly my point. Also on Linux you quickly get to the limits of what you can find in the first-party repos without ppas or downloading .rpm/.deb/… files. And same as on Windows, having a malware-free first-party repo/store won’t protect you from malware if you download your programs from elsewhere.