Does anyone know if current Pixel/Samsung hardwarewill support this??

  • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sony still makes phones with 3.5mm jacks. The Xperia 1 V, their latest model as far as I can tell, still boasts a normal 3.5mm port. I believe Sony’s DACs are well-regarded as well!

    The fact that thing is IP65/68 rated proves that either other manufacturers are lying when they claim they can’t do headphone jacks because of water resistance, or their engineers are inferior to Sony’s.

      • averyminya@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m sad that my phone broke a few months before it was released, especially since the prices were around the same!

        Though, I’m happy with my 512gb 1IV that I got sooner than the 256gb 1V :) Congrats!

    • Dee@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You see that Radicalized@lemmy.one?? I’ve got options!

      I’d love to keep the clean OS experience of the Pixel but I may have to go with Sony on my next phone. This one should last for another two or three years though.

      • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Check out videos like these, the Xperia UI is actually quite close to the Pixel UI. Their phones are very underrated in my opinion. Sony doesn’t maintain their Android updates for long, though (three years after release), which really sucks.

        Then again, buy the right phone and you can flash Sailfish on it to be just that little bit different!

      • quirzle@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m on an Xperia 1 III for the same reason. It’s been a fantastic phone, and I’m only now realizing how old it’s gotten by noticing they’re up to V.

    • renohren@partizle.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, but that’s a headphone jack, so there is a DAC somewhere in the phone. The traditional 3.5 mm AUX port is meant to have no DAC behind it and is made to directly plug into an amplifier, I believe you and OP are talking about 2 different things.

      • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        A 3.5mm port needs a digital-to-analog-converter (DAC). You can’t stream digital data over an audio port unless you use something like HDMI or TOSLink. You can’t feed that signal to a normal amplifier!

        • renohren@partizle.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          A 3.5 mm AUX port on a digital only output device would need a DAC , thought I usualy only see a 3.5 mm headphone jack on those devices, rarely a 3.5 mm AUX port). Analogue capable devices sometimes had two 3.5 mm ports for ages, one for headphones using an internal amplifier (often pretty bad)and one to plug directly into an amplifier called the 3.5mm AUX. Sound wasn’t preamplified before the 3.5 mm AUX plug. That caused many people to confuse 3.5 mm AUX and 3.5 mm headphone jacks and wonder why the sound was barely within hearing range. I beleive OP got confused in the nomenclature.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure but the rating means nothing. Phones still get water damaged and if they do are not covered by warranty. Just makes it harder to water damage.