A few things that are accessible within the USA include:

  • Participating in mutual aid programs
  • Campaigning on the local level, including for positions like poll watchers
  • Making your voice heard in community events in general
  • Joining your local DSA, networking
    • anarchost@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 months ago

      I made another post asking how people who wouldn’t vote were planning on doing direct action, and I got criticized for not asking about the people who were… so I made this post.

      I can’t win

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Am I missing something or did you make that other post on the notvoting comm of solarpunk?

        That’s like asking someone at a housewarming party why they oppose Israel’s genocide and then setting up a table on the campus mall to get people’s pro-israel views…

        • anarchost@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          You are missing something; my other post got removed, and on Lemmy it looks like nobody (including me) can see those removed posts. This is in my DMs:

          Your post has been removed.
          You can view the removed post here: >https://lemmy.world/post/12649980

          The reason he gave:
          This is not a community for US Politics.

            • anarchost@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I made the now-removed post first (in the other Ask Lemmy community), and somebody mentioned the “not voting” and suggested I repost it there, so I copied and pasted the text and title in.

              And then I made this post, dumbly putting it in a different community without realizing it wasn’t the same as the last one.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        Are you an American? Because the only Americans who call people “leftist” are using it in a pejorative sense.

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I call myself a leftist, thanks. But it’s messy and complicated, because there’s a lot of pragmatism mixed in there from the time I’ve spent in groups that have an anarchistic bent, since I’ve noted that they have a very, very hard time agreeing on action; great for debate, bad for decisions.

          • anarchost@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Cursed with the burden of eternal introspection, versus the fascist who can be content to act without thought.

            • norbert@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              This is the entire issue on the left and why they can never actually organize and run real candidates. While the left is busy arguing about the best way to organize the workplace the right just says “this guys (cold, lifeless) heart is in basically the right place” and pulls the lever.

              • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Wish you were wrong, but you aren’t. Leftists, in general, allow ‘perfect’ to be the mortal enemy of “better than what we have now”, “good enough for this election cycle”, and even “stop the worst monster to run for public office in the last century”.

                …Which is exactly why we have so many leftists refusing to vote for Biden; yeah, he’s not great, and he’s not even good on a most things, but refusing to vote for him makes it much, much more likely that a person that’s exponentially worse ends up getting elected. I don’t want to wake up the day after the election and face my trans friends and say, “Yeah, I’m sorry that you’re probably going to be murdered, but I had to send a message about funding genocide, and now the genocide is going to increase in pace, but you’re going to be killed in solidarity with Palestinians, so I guess that’s okay.”

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Are you an American? Because the only Americans who call people “leftist” are using it in a pejorative sense.

          The only people who think leftist is a pejorative are conservatives. Hmmmm…

          Call me a liberal though - and I’ll probably ignore it because it’s not worth explaining the difference to most people who will do so. But in my head dem’s fighting words. And ironically, I think there are many who also identify as leftists who would think I’m not left enough to call myself a leftist.

          Signed, a Leftist.

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            You’re right. The only people who use the term “leftist” are conservatives, or people who have studied European politics, because it doesn’t actually define anything in American politics. There is no “leftist” party and there are no “leftist” political groups. “Liberalism” is far more common because it describes an amenable approach to social issues, but also a laisez-faire approach to economic and foreign policy issues. I get not wanting to be called a liberal, or worse a neoliberal, but we do not have a proper labour party, or a communist party, or anything else even remotely resembling the “left.” It would be nice if we did, but the far right has done an excellent job of demonizing the very idea of it.

            That’s what I was referring to, which is why I assumed you might be a European, where such parties and ideologies exist out in the open.

            I meant no offense.

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              The only people who use the term “leftist” are conservatives

              It was the as a pejorative part that was significant to me, not use of the term itself. If someone is calling me a leftist with a sneer - that person is a conservative.

              Because the only Americans who call people “leftist” are using it in a pejorative sense.

              No offense taken, but I did wonder because of your seeming assumption that it would be pejorative. (Also please note I’m not OP)

              because it doesn’t actually define anything in American politics. There is no “leftist” party and there are no “leftist” political groups.

              I disagree that those two things are requirements for leftist to have a meaning. I’m also quite sure we have many leftist political groups, even if they have little political power.

        • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Generally people usually it as a pejorative will include “radical”, like any MF who wants people to have healthcare is out here doing kick flips and grinds.

      • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I can’t win

        Leftism isn’t about winning, that’s the part you’re missing. If you’re just doing what you can to win than you’re no different to and will fall for the same things as a fascist. I remember hearing “leftists are addicted to losing” and what makes that quote especially good is that it came from a guy who later outed themselves as being a fascist infiltrator once they no longer needed to convince people to vote Democrat.

        Marxists don’t care about winning. That’s idealism. What we want is an improving of material conditions for the working class.

        • themarty27@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          What he meant is that people are unhappy when he asks about non-voters, and also when he asks about voters. He can’t win [the approval of people on Lemmy]. Also, not all leftists are marxists.

          • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            If you can be a “leftist” without being at least some branch of marxism, than the term has lost all its meaning. I mean you don’t have to like the guy (he has many flaws) to realize the importance his work had on kickstarting the anticapitalist movement that started the left.

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I self identify as a leftist but I don’t think I’m ready to call myself a marxist. Maybe one day that will change, maybe not. Regardless of what definitions you may be about to link for me, what I think usually separates me from those I view as liberals is that they tend not to see corporate greed as a problem, or not as a pervasive problem.

              • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                The problem with corporation isn’t the “greed,” becuase that aspect is unsolvable. It’s that their current structure exists to exploit everything possible to benefit a very small number of people and they all act in cohort without coordination. A virtuous corporation cannot exist.

                • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  It’s that their current structure exists to exploit everything possible to benefit a very small number of people

                  I’m going to keep calling this greed.

    • clayh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Gotta make sure everyone knows they’re “cool” and totally part of the club