• Tramort@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    I am more likely to get in their way and ask them where their parents are.

    I was with you until that last sentence.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Like, physically block them from going in the road by walking in front of them and say “Hey, is that your mommy over there? Go to her”.

      • Tramort@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, it’s totally reasonable. But I’m the current climate I’m not blocking any person’s kid unless they’re going in front of an oncoming train.

      • shastaxc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Kidnappers like to confirm that parents are not nearby before snatching kids.

        • jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          What is the “right” action here then, in your mind? Would you rather a stranger grab the kids hand or pick them up?

          Touching someone else’s kid without explicit consent from the parent is likely to get you in some trouble unless you can explain to them that you just saved their kid

      • Tramort@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        “Where are your parents?” the man asked the little girl, as he cut off the direction she was walking

        I don’t want that to be a narrative that any person can ever tell about me. It could be a totally innocent act, but a sinister framing is easy to assume and impossible to refute.

        Hard pass.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Well, if the choice is between being perceived as a creep vs watching the kid get hurt, I’ll pick the option that doesn’t end with an injured kid. But if the kid is just wandering and not in danger, like I said, there’s no reason to intervene, for just the reason you listed.