• notanaltaccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s not a terrible point, but media literacy seems to be quite low no matter what and lessons are easily forgotten. Teaching scientific literacy through ecology courses would have a better impact.

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Pretending to read instead of engaging with the lesson is going to do that, yeah.

      Ecology is my favorite, and the focus of my secondary education, but it can’t come before chemistry and biology and those build on algebraic math and require and understanding of science built from “general science”. Should probably also have some statistics. Geology and cartography are going to be in there, as well as the history of conservation, there should be some anthropology… It’s all very iterative. Ecology specifically encompasses a ton of disciplines.

      I’ll add that introductory stuff can happen early. In my state we learn about the salmon life cycle in grade school and that includes a tiny bit about watersheds and streams and clean water. But it’s very rudimentary.

      • notanaltaccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        So many people don’t understand climate science. It’s unfortunate these topics couldn’t be integrated into a.climate science class. It may be too late anyway to change the impending global destruction trajectory.